HUH? He must have meant citizens should carry "GUM". Just offer up a piece of juicy fruit to the would be terrorist and it'll calm them right down. Or maybe a snickers. I works for Marsha Brady. Is there a show of hands for anyone that seriously thinks this will ever happen in the EU? Didn't think so. Guess this guy will be getting called to the head masters office post haste for some uh, re-education. Yeah, that's it.
1 posted on
08/01/2016 9:15:59 AM PDT by
rktman
To: rktman
Why is this an either-or choice?
2 posted on
08/01/2016 9:18:45 AM PDT by
CatOwner
To: rktman
3 posted on
08/01/2016 9:19:34 AM PDT by
Perseverando
(For Progressives, Islamonazis & other Totalitarians: It's all about PEOPLE CONTROL!)
To: rktman
"One is to say we want an armed citizenry.” Yes.
“Another is to say the enclaves are so secure that in order to get into the soft target you're going to have to pass through extraordinary security.”
Yes again. This is what you call, "borders".
5 posted on
08/01/2016 9:20:44 AM PDT by
marron
To: rktman
INTERPOL??!?!?!? Hmmm, wasn’t Reinhardt Heydrich once head of INTERPOL?
6 posted on
08/01/2016 9:22:21 AM PDT by
dfwgator
To: rktman
If you are going to be armed, go Swiss style!
7 posted on
08/01/2016 9:27:48 AM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: rktman
It's interesting that liberals decried Ronald Reagan for having a "wild west" mentality. For them, the "wild west" was a time when everyone was packing a six shooter.
Now, due to the inability and unwillingness of liberals to protect our culture, we may have to once again take up arms in the daily defense of ourselves and our families.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
