Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gaffer

“Don’t know really. But the officer should have realized you can’t park a patrol vehicle there with it.”

Bullshiite. No US citizen should have his first amendment constitutional rights abrogated for any reason, particularly employment considerations. We’re told that incessantly by the progs among us.


40 posted on 07/30/2016 8:10:30 AM PDT by DrPretorius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: DrPretorius

I don’t fully agree. I think officers have a commitment that extends to off-duty, especially if there is a patrol vehicle parked on the property.

Regardless of what that commitment is, it very likely was explained during the course of her employment.

I sympathize with the position, really. I’d fly one if my subdivision allowed it. But there are rules and requirements that we all acquiesce by one way or another to continually.

Coming up, I used to hear the phrase “moral turpitude” a lot. Especially when it pertained to high-profile people like movie stars, spokespersons, etc. The catch-all firing language from lawyers.


42 posted on 07/30/2016 8:16:52 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson