Skip to comments.
Chelsea Clinton hits the stage at the DNC in a $2,215 Roland Mouret dress
UK Daily Mail ^
| July 29, 2016
| Carly Stern
Posted on 07/29/2016 11:11:30 AM PDT by C19fan
Hillary Clinton may be a monochrome pantsuit kind of gal, but her daughter Chelsea Clinton clearly can't resist a pretty dress.
The 36-year-old introduced her mom at the Democratic National Convention on Thursday night in a figure-hugging Roland Mouret sheath, which she picked out in a bright red hue that was sure to make a stand out.
The $2,215 dress which was also worn in May by actress Jessica Alba showed that the mother-of-two has truly come a long way since her awkward teen years during her first time around in the White House.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-157 next last
But but...I thought Chelsea stated that she was not interested in money. She sure luvs the things money can buy.
1
posted on
07/29/2016 11:11:30 AM PDT
by
C19fan
To: C19fan
It’s secondhand... why be so hard on the lass for such frugality!
2
posted on
07/29/2016 11:13:16 AM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: C19fan
She looked really fat. She doesn’t have the right body for a slim tight fit.
3
posted on
07/29/2016 11:13:22 AM PDT
by
miss marmelstein
(Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Muslims)
To: C19fan
She’s still uglier than a horses arse.
4
posted on
07/29/2016 11:15:07 AM PDT
by
I want the USA back
(Islam mandates warfare against unbelievers and is absolutely incompatible with Western society.)
To: C19fan
5
posted on
07/29/2016 11:15:10 AM PDT
by
corkoman
To: C19fan
Proving again tha Conservative Women Rock!!
She looks ok.
6
posted on
07/29/2016 11:15:44 AM PDT
by
Uversabound
(Our Military past and present: Our Highest example of Brotherhood of Man & Doing God's Will)
To: C19fan
That’s honestly not that bad for a dress for a once in a lifetime event. There are tons and tons of evening gowns that are more expensive than that.
7
posted on
07/29/2016 11:16:06 AM PDT
by
Anitius Severinus Boethius
(www.wilsonharpbooks.com - Sign up for my new release e-mail and get my first novel for free)
To: C19fan
But but...I thought Chelsea stated that she was not interested in money. She sure luvs the things money can buy.
Clintons don't pay for anything.
They live on other peoples money.
We don't need any Russian hackers to let us know there are no emails regarding yoga lessons on Chelsea's e mail account.
I foresee pant suits in her future.
8
posted on
07/29/2016 11:16:52 AM PDT
by
rdcbn
("There is no means of avoiding a final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alt)
To: C19fan
That dress looked a whole lot better on Jessica Alba.
No tummy lump, and not a frump. The dress looked 2 sizes too small for Chelsea Hubble.
9
posted on
07/29/2016 11:17:05 AM PDT
by
Don W
( When blacks riot, neighborhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn)
To: miss marmelstein
I thought it was ugly on her. Showed all of her fat. I thought: with all her money why can’t she get a designer to fit her with clothes that flatter her.
Dress was constricting like the liberals are; not free flowing.
To: C19fan
When rotund was king maybe..., well, nah!
11
posted on
07/29/2016 11:17:27 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(He wins & we do, our nation does, the world does. It's morning in America again. You are living it!)
12
posted on
07/29/2016 11:17:43 AM PDT
by
dsrtsage
(One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%en)
To: C19fan
Taken as she was leaving for the convention-
13
posted on
07/29/2016 11:18:41 AM PDT
by
RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
To: DoughtyOne
Too bad she spilled coffee right down the front of that dress.
14
posted on
07/29/2016 11:18:54 AM PDT
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: DoughtyOne
Web, come pick up your kid.
15
posted on
07/29/2016 11:20:07 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(He wins & we do, our nation does, the world does. It's morning in America again. You are living it!)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
LOL, thought along those lines myself.
16
posted on
07/29/2016 11:21:06 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(He wins & we do, our nation does, the world does. It's morning in America again. You are living it!)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
I wondered what that was. The only thing I can think of is that it’s the shadow of two microphones in front of her.
17
posted on
07/29/2016 11:22:21 AM PDT
by
rightwingintelligentsia
(Democrats: The perfect party for the helpless and stupid, and those who would rule over them.)
To: C19fan
Big girl in a too little dress. Someone should have told her it was too little.
Yes... I know she just delivered a baby 6 weeks ago....no excuse for trying to wear a “pre-pregnacy” size.
18
posted on
07/29/2016 11:22:59 AM PDT
by
Ms Mable
To: Ms Mable
What did Ivanka’s dress cost again? $158.00?
To: Ms Mable
I saw Chelsea in that red dress hugging her mother in that white pantsuit.......like a flame licking at a marshmallow was all I could think.....and that they were both a little weighty.
20
posted on
07/29/2016 11:24:40 AM PDT
by
tioga
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-157 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson