[Eric in the Ozarks]

Given WSJ’s consistant anti-Trump harping, the woman’s actions appear to fit.

[Kenny]

If there’s one thing I don’t understand in all this is lack of accountability and consequences. Media proven to be working for a specific candidate, the media who’s responsible for getting objective news to the people, and nothing comes of it.

[KeyLargo]

The Wall Street Journal editors have admitted already that they prefer Hillary over Trump.

[Olog-hai]

The paper who declared that the US Constitution should have an amendment stating “There shall be open borders” (a goal of the communists) will always hate a proponent of protection of borders, even more so a GOP presidential candidate who states it in strong terms.

[Chgogal]

So true.

[Mouton]

DNC talking points? No, not just them. They take the dribble handed out by the Dem whitehouse press office extant and run with it. No questions asked. Most news people long ago we just known as sots. Now they are drunk with politics.

History of journalism here has been a tad ragged. Morrow, Severied, Cronkite are held up as paragons. Not mentioned is some of journalists in history have been on the pad of gangsters. It was common knowledge that during the Capone era in Chicago, they wrote pieces of gang propaganda for him. Even Puzo in his Godfather books notes the gang had journalists on the pad. The “fourth branch” of government is more like the 5th column.