Donna Brazile: "more emails are coming."

Twitter.com ^

[Colofornian]

Interim DNC chair, Donna Brazile: "I want to learn what is behind all of this, because more emails are coming."

[Vaquero]

Are the democrats prepping Moochie Obama and keeping on Hot Standby to take Hillary’s place as the democrat nominee when Wikileaks releases the next batch of eMails?

Wouldn't that go to Bernie? I hope not, cause Bernie can win. Hillary is cooked...stick a fork in her.

[chajin]

I agree; the Democrats want Hillary to lose.

1) Hillary’s loss will mean the end of the Clinton era of influence peddling. The Chicago mob would for all practical purposes run the party apparatus.

2) The Democrats have to run against someone, to avoid the kinds of debacles that occurred in 2010 and 2014. Trump is, in their minds, the perfect bogeyman to help them regain control of the Senate in 2018, and perhaps the House in 2020.

3) S is about to HTF. So much easier to blame it on a sitting President than a former one, and Trump would be the sitting President who would receive all the blame.

4) With Clinton’s loss, the torch will be passed to a new, much more socialist, much more progressivist, much more ideologically pure generation of politicians. Leftists who think of the Clintons, Pelosi, Schumer, and most of the CBC as too old and not leftist enough would be able to rise up and claim the mantle of True Progressives.

P.S. Warren is toast. The 2020 nomination is Michelle’s, if she wants it.

[tennmountainman]

LOL.

So true.

[Dr. Ursus]

I didn’t tell that cracker,if he forgets my hot sauce again he’s fired!

[Qiviut]

Eventually all the manipulations catch up with you.

***********************************

It’s been a long time coming .... and I’m not convinced they (Dems/Clintons) won’t wiggle out of this, too. Debbie is toast, but she’s a Clinton puppet, not the “big fish”.

[Colofornian]

This is so typical of an out of control regime. They want to know who’s behind exposing their vile nature, not what they can to to clean up their act.

Yup. Brazile's "I'm sorry" to the Hispanic delegation, for example, was in reality, a type of "I'm sorry you had to find out about it."

[Fido969]

Democrat response to email leak:

[thoughtomator]

The Dems are batshit insane if they think Manchell is going to fly as a Presidential candidate. Xe has never even held office before.

[chajin]

The Dems are batshit insane if they think Manchell is going to fly as a Presidential candidate. Xe has never even held office before.

Democrats' response: "Neither did President Trump."

[Brilliant]

In other words she knows there are worse emails in the wings.

But Kerry threatened the Russians today if they release them. I guess Kerry can get tough with Russia if he wants.

[JohnEBoy]

I see two approaches for email release by WikiLeaks:

1. Release today or tonight to give everyone a chance to review them and document the juicy ones before the coronation, thus putting the coronation into total chaos and disarray ... or

2. Release them on Friday, after the coronation. Assuming they are as juicy as we expect, then she will be campaigning under a very dark cloud, all while the DNC can’t replace her.

I’m good with either approach, but if I had a choice, I would opt for no. 1.

[Buckeye McFrog]

My guess is that Julian Assange has declared war on the British/European/American rulers who have kept him imprisoned in that basement for the past four years. He is likely thinking if he takes out Hillary the Brit Government will crap a brick wondering what he’s got on them and let him go.

[bert]

Bibi my friend.....

Can you please give Vlad some more of the emails you hacked?

Good job so far. Give my best to Mossad

Best Regards

DJT

[gasport]

Save a few Acme plutonium grade emails for an hour before her acceptance speech.

[Buckeye McFrog]

But Kerry threatened the Russians today if they release them.

Oh, so now it's the job of the US Secretary of State to protect the political future of the Democrat Nominee for POTUS??

[bella1]

Number 1 sounds good to me. Now, who do we let know that it has been decided :)

[JohnEBoy]

Good idea. I was wrong about the DNC not replacing her after Friday. If the news is bad enough, she can make a statement about how the campaign has taken a toll on her health and play the victim card ... “I swear I don’t know why everyone is picking on poor little me.” Then the DNC can “reluctantly” replace her with Bernie/Biden/Fauxahautas or whoever.

[bk1000]

“Someone else on another thread asked whether it was sinful to enjoy this.”

I guess it is...dang....

The Book of Proverbs mentions an emotion similar to schadenfreude: “Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth: Lest the LORD see it, and it displease him, and he turn away his wrath from him.” (Proverbs 24:17–18, King James Version).

[gasport]

Sanders/Michelle ‘16 would cover many bases.

[rivercat]

[snip]I agree; the Democrats want Hillary to lose.

1) Hillary’s loss will mean the end of the Clinton era of influence peddling. The Chicago mob would for all practical purposes run the party apparatus.[/snip]
<
5) With the impending second housing bubble and financial meltdown approaching, they'd like nothing more than to get a Republican into office so they can blame him.