I've not justified the furtherance of terrorism, you are reading other things into what I've said.
These people are networking to assassinate police officers. Police officers are the enforcement arm of the courts. Without them no justice exists. No laws are enforced resulting in anarchy.
Irrelevant to the points I've brought up.
Despite this, you see no reason why a judge would take offense to heralding and validating a terrorist group intent in part on destroying police officers.
Who said that he'd have to herald and validate if he allowed them to express their opinion? Moreover, you seem to completely ignore the fact that the opposing lawyer should easily be able to call the other to the stand and ask them about the display to explain themselves to the jury… or do you disagree?
If you believe any Judge in the land is going to allow a person to bring in an eight and a half by eleven sign plugging ISIS into one of their courtrooms, you’re wrong.
That is all that amounts to. She brought in a pin heralding a terrorist organization.
The Constitution is not a suicide pact.
You are in a round about way of backing her play, and I’m not signing on to it. Your rally around the Constitution efforts aren’t going to fly on this one.