I didn't say he couldn't, but you apparently cannot look to principles and philosophies behind something which is what I've been talking about the whole time.
So it’s your principles and philosophy that guides you to defend someone honoring and promoting the Black Lives movement within a courtroom.
Number one, what principles would that display?
Two, that’s a very problematic philosophy.
You will probably respond that this isn’t what you intended at all. Perhaps I’m wrong about that.
By raising these issues at this point, I cannot dismiss the fact that’s exactly what the end result is.
This is a thread about someone honoring and promoting the Black Lives movement within a courtroom. It’s a poor place to expound on the Judge’s limitations. I think he was sell within reason to address the woman on the issue.
I wish we had more judges like that.
It tells me it’s very unlikely he’s an Obama appointee.