More efforts to try to STEAL the vote.
Link to opinion:
http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/14/14-41127-CV3.pdf
Setting up a stolen election in November.
First Wisconsin, now Texas.
The memo has apparently gone out to all of the Federal Judges.
...But required fro virtually all else.
If it isn’t too burdensome to buy beer it isn’t too burdensome for anyone to vote.
“Progressives” ... we’d be better off if they all just moved away.
Appeals Court = minorities too f’ing stupid to sign up for a free government ID. So does this mean any Joe Blow can sign up for welfare and food stamps and the government wouldn’t have any cause to validate their identity?
Ignore ‘em.
Catharina Haynes is a GWB appointment.
So the ruling didn’t actually claim that the bill did bad things, only that the lawmakers didn’t listen to the opposing views when they wrote and lawfully voted for the measure? Am I seeing that right?
So now all it takes to get a law declared unconstitutional is that the lawmakers don’t get along with others. Okay.
Someone be sure to call me when a serious plan for secession is formulated.
And yet, not one credible eligible voter was presented who would be adversely affected by this law.
The best example I can think of to illustrate the crookedness of libs is their opposition to voter ID. The ONLY reason to oppose it is because it makes it tougher to cheat.
These leftist judges can go to hell— hate to say it like that.
The U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals should be impeached for such an insane decision.
They’ll probably slam several more decisions like this down on us to corrupt the vote at the last minute, such that there is no way to appeal them in time.
The Dems are warming up the Buses
A computer system at the polls could record the fingerprint of any who voted. Afterward, a leisurely comparison of prints could detect duplicate voting. Severe penalties for fraud as a deterrent.
So in essence the judge is saying that minorities are too stupid to obtain an ID?