When I first began hearing about Milo, I said he’s not really a homosexual, he just plays one on the internet. I honestly thought he was faking his online persona, and doing so masterfully, in order to reach people who ordinarily have closed their ears and minds to conservative common sense.
It took awhile for me to grasp that he really is gay, especially since he also claims to be a Catholic.
Subsequently, his trolling of liberals made his gayness seem somehow less important, even as he loudly and often mentioned his preference for anonymous sex with muscular black men. I glossed over it, assuming he was just trolling the liberal tendency to insist all republicans are all racist. His statements after the Orlando massacre were spot on, and needed to be heard.
But now, pictures of naked children behind the podium as he speaks—?
This brings us —well, me, anyway—crashing back into the reality of homosexualism, which regards the sexual abuse of children (”twinks”) as just another “orientation” and subset of the homosexual world.
So now I’m forced to wonder if perhaps Milo thinks the Catholic clergy’s abuse of altar boys wasn’t so bad...? Just an interesting kink in an otherwise conservative institution—?
Bad optics, Milo. You blew it, AFAIC.
Put me on your list of former fans.
Milo also claims to be Jewish, btw.
I liked him initially and sometimes I still like what he says. But this may be a bridge to far...