[blueyon]

So a "TWEET" can get a staffer in trouble BUT the DOJ can not say if Clinton's misuse of classified information would get he in trouble. Anyone else see the double standard here? Rules only apply if they want them too!

[mkjessup]

While the DOJ is all 'a twitter' about an unauthorized or improper 'tweet', Hillary Rotten Criminal remains free as a bird:

[A Navy Vet]

Just covering their rear because of some blatant un-scripted remark from one of their own kind. Doubt any repercussions.

[Mr. K]

But he didn’t INTEND TO use the wrong twitter account

[Robert DeLong]

With the tweet being: CNN is the biggest troll of all lmao #Petty,”

It sounds like it was a pro Trump person. Thus the reason for the admonishment. If they had tweeted something positive about Hillary, we would have never heard about it.

[tomkat]

.. what difference does it make !

[TigersEye]

Everything about the DOJ is inappropriate.

[Brilliant]

So was the Tweet pro or anti-Trump? The Tweeter was dissing CNN, but I guess he could have been suggesting that CNN is too pro-Trump. That’s how I read it.

[pgkdan]

So a "TWEET" can get a staffer in trouble BUT the DOJ can not say if Clinton's misuse of classified information would get he in trouble. Anyone else see the double standard here? Rules only apply if they want them too!

Sounds like it was a pro Trump tweet criticizing CNN. That is undoubtedly a crime.

[Corpus_Delicious]

How dare a DOJ employee criticize the Clinton News Network!

[Zack Attack]

DOJ logic - lying under oath may or may not be acceptable but don’t dare send an inappropriate Twitter.