Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should We Drop the Term 'Living Fossil'?
Institute for Creation Research ^ | 7-18-16 | Brian Thomas

Posted on 07/18/2016 7:33:05 AM PDT by fishtank

Should We Drop the Term 'Living Fossil'?

by Brian Thomas, M.S. *

› Fossils Show Stasis and No Transitional Forms

Mark Carnall at the Oxford University Museum of Natural History recently wrote an article for the UK newspaper The Guardian. He argues that we should stop using the term "living fossil."1 What does his argument reveal about evolutionary thinking?

Charles Darwin first used the phrase in the Origin of Species to describe life forms that look essentially the same today as their fossil versions, even though their fossils are absent from intervening rock layers.

(Excerpt) Read more at icr.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: creation; fossil; keithrichards
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: Moonman62

Scary thought...he’s a few weeks younger than I am.


21 posted on 07/18/2016 9:50:39 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Keith Richards, that is.


22 posted on 07/18/2016 9:51:21 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson