Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnBrowdie

And they didn’t ask about Johnson or Davis, so we can’t tell which way the undecideds are leaning.

22% undecided, when both candidates have near universal name recognition, is a very volatile race.


40 posted on 07/16/2016 7:38:04 PM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius (www.wilsonharpbooks.com - Sign up for my new release e-mail and get my first novel for free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

How many “undecideds” are really pro Trump, but don’t want to tell strangers that?

My guess is more than a few.


120 posted on 07/17/2016 5:19:44 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
22% undecided, when both candidates have near universal name recognition, is a very volatile race.

If you consider Clinton as the "incumbent," then this looks very bad for her. Undecideds usually break for the challenger. Clinton campaign knows this, and has to try to counter it with hysterical fear mongering. Likely to over reach and backfire.

152 posted on 07/17/2016 6:26:59 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson