LA Times can’t bring themselves to totally admit that Trump has a lead, so it becomes an “apparent lead”. Is it any wonder we hate them so much?
Apparently, the apparent LA Times doesn’t believe their apparent poll.
It’s over but the crying for Madame Cankles and the crooked left...
The LA Times says that Evil, Racist White Men hate Hillary. It’s the Ku Klux Klan all over again!
Lots of lamps go air borne this weekend as the valium consumption among liberal losers skyrockets.
By the time we get to November the Ministry of Propaganda won’t be able to hide the tidal wave.
So all of the major polls have it tied or Trump up slightly, all except NBC of course which as to be an outlier where they over sample Dems
This horrible news will have a resounding impact from coast to coast in every bath house in America.
Trump 43
Clinton 40
This is the 2nd poll to show him leading, while the NY Times has them tied. That tells me that he’s probably leading by at least 5-10 points if they can’t even rig their own polls to get her ahead.
But, wait, Reuters will poll 75 percent democrats and announce that she’s leading by 20.
Trump’s lead will widen after the convention and will continue to the election.
The Pence pick....
A poll booster, or poll sinker?
Yes, Trump is ahead.
Get used to it.
“apparent, itty bitty, eentsy weentsy, tiny winy, slimmest of slim leads, if you even want to call it a lead” lead....
It must be a vast right wing conspiracy.....I’m part of it.
Posted this on another thread - maybe this is where it will get some attention.
I have no idea how dependable this poll is, but I like it;)
MSN - Who do you support in the 2016 Presidential race?
Of 205,758 respondents:
25% Hilary Clinton
59% Donald Trump
8% someone else
8% haven’t decided
It must tie the guts of the puppets at LAT in knots to admit Trump has a slim lead. Because we all know a slim lead is probably a big lead, they always under report Republicans.
These polls, if based on anything other than desire to affect the voting population, aare likely based on the perceived official vote count rather than the prospective actual legitimate vote. They would thus be taking into account what they believe of the Democrat ability to add hordes of spurious voters into the count and to falsify the Diebolds. Granting a “slim lead” might just be a recognition that Trump has as much as 70% of the legitimate vote sewed up, enough that the Democrats will permit a “slim” win in the official count to avoid unrest that could overturn them.
“apparent slim lead”
Yeah. Right. When Crooked Hillary was APPARENTLY ahead in the polls with a “slim” lead, the enemedia never described the situation as an “apparent slim lead”. Only when Trump rises to the top is the lead described as just “apparent”, you know, as in “maybe [hopefully] not real”.
Is this national or CA??
If the former, great, if the latter, this race is over.