Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Mojo

But...but... “The science is settled” Note that there is no mention of what data was manipulated, nor how it was skewed. How many other government studies were manipulated to support a preconceived outcome? Global warming anyone?


3 posted on 07/09/2016 8:56:20 AM PDT by nuke_road_warrior (Making the world safe for nuclear power for over 20 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nuke_road_warrior

I’ve been taking a number of online presidential surveys and they contain other questions.

They dont ask IF GW is real, they ask what are you doing to help the environment.

They dont ASK if gays are discriminated against. They ask what you can do to stop it.

They asked which of the following coprorations MOST needed to contribute to: environment, ghettos, gay rights, and there was no choice for” GTFUOH.


5 posted on 07/09/2016 9:01:20 AM PDT by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: nuke_road_warrior

“How many other government studies were manipulated to support a preconceived outcome?”

Testimony was given in 2011 to a House Natural Resources Committee Hearing on Fisheries that detailed how data that was used to totally close the South Atlantic Red Snapper Fishery was fabricated, skewed, flawed, insufficient and unreliable.

Nothing has been done to date. Its still closed indefinitely to both recreational and commercial.


6 posted on 07/09/2016 9:17:03 AM PDT by Captain7seas (UNexit. Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson