Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ryan: Congress could strip Clinton of access to classified material
The Washington Times ^ | Wednesday, July 6, 2016 | By Stephen Dinan

Posted on 07/06/2016 7:48:10 AM PDT by b4its2late

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: Mr. K

Empty cans make a lot of noise.


41 posted on 07/06/2016 8:12:39 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

No Ryan...

She should step down, but we all know she will never do that on her own.

We all know too you will not go after her. Hence, why you came up with such a WEAKLING response!

Ryan = Putz


42 posted on 07/06/2016 8:13:33 AM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
"As someone who worked as an investigator with the DOD, I can state unequivocally that any individual who mishandled classified information in a manner similar to what happened in this case would, at the very least, have their security clearance immediatey suspended and, after a hearing, the clearance would likely be permanently revoked."

"Additionally, any access to Special Access Programs(SAPs) would be immediately revoked without a hearing as there is are no appeal rights for SAPs."

“Crisis of Character: A White House Secret": (page 148)

"She, (Monica) had no business playing in a high stake environment within arm’s reach of intelligence of the CIA, FBI, the State Department, and the Department of Defense. I mean, the Spook $hit that moved and was approved through the White House was the most sensitive intel in existence. Actionable intel is power. How could anyone in the Secret Service be expected to his or her job, if the Americans allowed people like the Clintons to assume national leadership?

43 posted on 07/06/2016 8:13:36 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There is nothing special about the words "radical Islam"!!! It is just "Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PeteePie

Brave Sir Ryan ran away
Bravely ran away away
When danger reared its ugly head
He bravely turned his tail and fled
Yes, brave Sir Ryan turned about
And gallantly he chickened out
Bravely taking to his feet
He beat a very brave retreat
Bravest of the brave, Sir Ryan!

Read more: Monty Python - Brave Sir Robin Ran Away Lyrics | MetroLyrics


44 posted on 07/06/2016 8:20:10 AM PDT by Mr. K (Trump will win NY state - choke on that HilLIARy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Obama and Bill Clinton, neither of whom could have passed background checks for access to confidential information, both received briefings. Why would we start caring now?


45 posted on 07/06/2016 8:21:06 AM PDT by Defiant (After 8 years of Chump Change, it's time for Trump Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Could, but won’t.

Congress doesn’t have the backbone to pull that kind of stunt, especially now that Clinton has basically been exonerated.


46 posted on 07/06/2016 8:22:00 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbkS26PX4rc&feature=youtu.be

Best video I’ve seen so far on the Comey/Clinton matter. Every lie rebutted in under two minutes. This is a ready made Trump ad, guaranteed to please Trump supporters. Please share if you like.


47 posted on 07/06/2016 8:22:40 AM PDT by The Continental Op
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Could... but since you’re Paul Ryan there’s no chance in hell. It’s symbolic anyway, because you Paul Ryan are working diligently to get her elected, you Uniparty monkey.


48 posted on 07/06/2016 8:23:36 AM PDT by Ray76 (The evil effect of Obergefell is to deprive the people of rule of law & subject us to tyranny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Pubbies blustering — not a pretty sight.

They can’t even be taken seriously in their feigned indignation.

Another hearing = another exercise in futility.


49 posted on 07/06/2016 8:25:32 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Maybe they *could* but I’m virtually certain they won’t. I am 100% certain the only reason he floated that idea publicly was to try to score some points with naive conservatives who might actually think it would go anywhere. Put up or shut up Ryan et. al. To us, you are all one big pile of steaming corruption. Rise above the sewage, or own it.


50 posted on 07/06/2016 8:26:08 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Karoo
But do we have the will?

We will know the answer to that on Nov. 8, 2016.

51 posted on 07/06/2016 8:31:03 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Jus Soli + Jus Sanguinis = NBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

OH PLEASE ... Opie has set the standard ... she will go around Congress on a daily basis.


52 posted on 07/06/2016 8:35:46 AM PDT by dartuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Karoo

I think we have the will. What we lack is a plan! We need a cohesive coordinated plan.


53 posted on 07/06/2016 8:38:55 AM PDT by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

They could....but they won’t.


54 posted on 07/06/2016 8:39:28 AM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

HAHAHAH!!!! Democrats are LAW-LESS because Republicans are BALL-LESS!!


55 posted on 07/06/2016 8:53:30 AM PDT by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

I have a better plan for Ryan.

He should grow a spine and release all classified information he has in his possession on the Internet, and dare the administration to indict him.


56 posted on 07/06/2016 9:19:59 AM PDT by cgbg (Epistemology is not a spectator sport.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

How about prosecuting her for perjury to Congress under oath? That’s a felony...


57 posted on 07/06/2016 9:22:30 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ('You can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late
Sounds like an excuse for personal inaction.

When you cut through all the BS, you are left with: Congress could act, therefore I don't have to do anything myself.

58 posted on 07/06/2016 10:57:56 AM PDT by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

“Sure, would love to see it, but as was her indictment, highly doubtful.”

I’m still waiting for those pigs to fly.


59 posted on 07/06/2016 1:19:39 PM PDT by kagnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

“I have a better plan for Ryan. He should grow a spine and release all classified information he has in his possession on the Internet, and dare the administration to indict him.”

All I can say is that sometimes it seems to us that the LORD had made a mistake, all the bones are in the head and none in the back.


60 posted on 07/06/2016 1:48:03 PM PDT by kagnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson