Posted on 07/05/2016 11:03:20 AM PDT by walford
FBI Director James Comey shed new light on Hillary Clintons private email setup when he announced Tuesday that the FBI would not recommend charges against the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee. Here are some of the new details revealed by Comey.
113 emails were classified at the time they were sent
Both Clintons presidential campaign and the State Department have repeatedly insisted that none of the approximately 2,000 emails now considered classified was deemed sensitive at the time.
But Comey on Tuesday said that wasnt quite the case.
In fact, federal agencies have claimed that 113 emails in more than 50 chains contained sensitive information at the time they were sent or received by her private setup, which she kept at her home in New York. Of those, eight chains contained information considered top secret, the highest level of classification.
Three of the sensitive emails were discovered among the thousands the former secretary of State claimed were purely personal in nature and which she deleted before giving her servers to the FBI last year.
An undisclosed very small number of messages bore markings indicating the presence of classified information, he said, without divulging additional details.
Thousands of work emails were deleted
Clinton has previously framed the decision to delete half of her machines cache of approximately 60,000 messages as an effort to avoid letting her private life become public.
I chose not to keep my private personal emails emails about planning Chelsea's wedding or my mother's funeral arrangements, condolence notes to friends as well as yoga routines, family vacations, the other things you typically find in inboxes, she said in March 2015 in a widely scrutinized press conference at the United Nations.
But FBI investigators uncovered several thousand work-related emails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to the State Department, Comey said on Tuesday.
The bureau found traces of those emails on machines connected to the private clintonemail.com domain, as well as fragments from decommissioned servers and from the email accounts of people who had communicated with her.
No official emails were intentionally deleted
None of the work-related messages was intentionally deleted from Clintons machine as part of an effort to evade federal laws, Comey said on Tuesday.
We found no evidence that any of the additional work-related e-mails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them, he said. Our assessment is that, like many e-mail users, Secretary Clinton periodically deleted e-mails or e-mails were purged from the system when devices were changed.
Both government systems and commercial services such as Yahoo or Gmail routinely archive old emails. But Clintons bespoke setup did not include that feature, Comey said.
While deciding which emails to preserve and which to delete, Clintons lawyers also used a search tool and did not go through the emails one by one, as officials from the FBI did as part of their investigation. In doing so, they may have accidentally overlooked some emails that should have been sent to the government.
So it is not surprising that we discovered emails that were not on Secretary Clintons system in 2014, when she produced the 30,000 emails to the State Department, Comey said.
There were likely more work-related emails that will never be recovered
The FBI could not recover all of the emails that Clinton deleted, so theres a good chance that other official messages will be lost forever.
It is also likely that there are other work-related emails that they did not produce to State and that we did not find elsewhere, Comey said.
Those messages, he added, are likely now gone because they deleted all e-mails they did not return to State, and the lawyers cleaned their devices in such a way as to preclude complete forensic recovery.
Clinton used more than one server and multiple mobile devices
The public narrative about Clintons setup is that she used a single server throughout her tenure at the State Department, which was given to the FBI as part of its investigation last year.
But the reality is somewhat more complicated. In fact, Clinton changed machines when older ones became out of date, leaving a trail of out-of-order servers behind her.
Secretary Clinton used several different servers and administrators of those servers during her four years at the State Department, and used numerous mobile devices to view and send e-mail on that personal domain, Comey revealed on Tuesday. As new servers and equipment were employed, older servers were taken out of service, stored and decommissioned in various ways.
Old servers, such as one that was decommissioned in 2013, contained email fragments in the unused slack space that investigators combed to try to resurrect some of the old messages.
It's possible she was hacked
FBI officials did not uncover any evidence that Clintons private setup may have been hacked by foreigners, terrorists, activists or anyone else.
But that doesnt mean it didnt happen, according to the head of the FBI.
Hackers have targeted people she communicated with, such as longtime confidant Sidney Blumenthal, and her arrangement was relatively well-known and readily apparent, Comey said.
It is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clintons personal email account, he said.
Anyone else might have faced administrative punishments
Clinton was let off the hook in the eyes of the law, but the FBI doesnt want to send a message that her behavior was OK.
There was evidence of potential violations of laws against handling classified information, Comey said.
Just not enough to bring charges.
Our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case, he told reporters.
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences, Comey added. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions.
But that is not what we are deciding now.
It is clear that Hillary’s priority was protecting her official communications from being scrutinized by the American people — as would have been the case if they were hosted on government servers [viz. FOIA].
She didn’t care so much that keeping classified information on private servers would make it vulnerable to those who mean us harm.
Even risking this is tantamount to treason.
But, as noted in an earlier post, HRC is a High Priestess of the Left.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3278456/posts
Therefore, she is not only above the law, she IS the law. Whatever she does is, by definition, legal and moral.
Anything for The Cause — even if that means putting the rest of us at risk.
I don't think they are going to get away with it this time.
It's been 15 years since Sandy Burgler stuffed his under ware
15 years ago, the beat down of the United States by globalism was just picking up steam but many our industries were still strong
The United States has been severely beat down since then by massive off shoring and people are getting very concerned by the obvious drop in living standards and how it is affecting them.
The Democrat base is driven by raw hatred of Republicans but Trump is the anti Republican who is hated by the Republican establishment so it is really hard to drum up hate the guy. On the other hand, Hillary is hated by many Democrats who supported Obama or Sanders.
The reality is that Trump has summed up the situation and framed the debate perfectly.
The Washington Political Elite, Republican and Democrat, are getting rich and making us poor by selling America and the American people out to the highest bidders, both foreign and domestic.
Trump's message is not one of populism, it's a simple statement of fact based on the reality we see unfolding before us.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/437479/fbi-rewrites-federal-law-let-hillary-hook
“...in order to give Mrs. Clinton a pass, the FBI rewrote the statute, inserting an intent element that Congress did not require. The added intent element, moreover, makes no sense: The point of having a statute that criminalizes gross negligence is to underscore that government officials have a special obligation to safeguard national defense secrets; when they fail to carry out that obligation due to gross negligence, they are guilty of serious wrongdoing. The lack of intent to harm our country is irrelevant. People never intend the bad things that happen due to gross negligence.”
There is no way in hell Hillary will EVER drop out. She’s wanted to be president all of her life and she’d keep going even if she was on death’s door.
Clinton:"Suckers"
Comey: "I serve two standards of Law.
Criminals, rapists, and politicians are above all others.
You must now bow, serve, and obey."
Nixon was never indicted. He resigned as President and Ford preemptively pardoned him.
The problem is, Obama will probably pardon her before he leaves office, should Trump be elected.
Pardon her for what ?
she has not been charged with a crime or found guilty of one
What evidence do you have for this?
I think this is a case for Presentments.
If we could get a large-ish proportion of grand juries to issue Presentments over this, it could shake things up a lot.
The biggest question is this: how does one get in contact with a Grand Jury?
So? There's probably enough stuff there linking the Clinton Foundation to high-level politicians/bureaucrats that we could carve out a large piece of the cancer by following those leads. — So unless Obama pardons the entire government, then there's a lot that can be done.
And if he does issue a mass pardon for the government, We the People will veto that with rule 30-06 and no bag-limit on federal agents. (Seriously, if there is no justice to be had within the rules, then the American people will certainly decide that these are insufferable situations.) all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government
How does this FBI information, evidence that laws were broken, get in front of a federal grand jury, or some other grand jury?
How does this FBI information, evidence that laws were broken, get in front of a federal grand jury, or some other grand jury?
How does this FBI information, evidence that laws were broken, get in front of a federal grand jury, or some other grand jury?
How does this FBI information, evidence that laws were broken, get in front of a federal grand jury, or some other grand jury?
How does this FBI information, evidence that laws were broken, get in front of a federal grand jury, or some other grand jury?
Nixon wasn’t charged with anything either, but Ford pardoned him.
yes he can.... Ford’s pardon of Nixon was worded to cover any and all acts during his entire term of office, even though he had not been charged never mind convicted of any crime.
The only limitation on the Presidential pardon power is that it cannot apply to future events, because then it would in effect be the executive legislating, not allowed by the Constitution. But there is not limit to what a pardon can be written to cover for past events, even events unknown or unspecified at the timee of the pardon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.