Clinton:"Suckers"
Comey: "I serve two standards of Law.
Criminals, rapists, and politicians are above all others.
You must now bow, serve, and obey."
Posted on 07/05/2016 11:03:20 AM PDT by walford
It is clear that Hillary’s priority was protecting her official communications from being scrutinized by the American people — as would have been the case if they were hosted on government servers [viz. FOIA].
She didn’t care so much that keeping classified information on private servers would make it vulnerable to those who mean us harm.
Even risking this is tantamount to treason.
But, as noted in an earlier post, HRC is a High Priestess of the Left.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3278456/posts
Therefore, she is not only above the law, she IS the law. Whatever she does is, by definition, legal and moral.
Anything for The Cause — even if that means putting the rest of us at risk.
I don't think they are going to get away with it this time.
It's been 15 years since Sandy Burgler stuffed his under ware
15 years ago, the beat down of the United States by globalism was just picking up steam but many our industries were still strong
The United States has been severely beat down since then by massive off shoring and people are getting very concerned by the obvious drop in living standards and how it is affecting them.
The Democrat base is driven by raw hatred of Republicans but Trump is the anti Republican who is hated by the Republican establishment so it is really hard to drum up hate the guy. On the other hand, Hillary is hated by many Democrats who supported Obama or Sanders.
The reality is that Trump has summed up the situation and framed the debate perfectly.
The Washington Political Elite, Republican and Democrat, are getting rich and making us poor by selling America and the American people out to the highest bidders, both foreign and domestic.
Trump's message is not one of populism, it's a simple statement of fact based on the reality we see unfolding before us.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/437479/fbi-rewrites-federal-law-let-hillary-hook
“...in order to give Mrs. Clinton a pass, the FBI rewrote the statute, inserting an intent element that Congress did not require. The added intent element, moreover, makes no sense: The point of having a statute that criminalizes gross negligence is to underscore that government officials have a special obligation to safeguard national defense secrets; when they fail to carry out that obligation due to gross negligence, they are guilty of serious wrongdoing. The lack of intent to harm our country is irrelevant. People never intend the bad things that happen due to gross negligence.”
There is no way in hell Hillary will EVER drop out. She’s wanted to be president all of her life and she’d keep going even if she was on death’s door.
Clinton:"Suckers"
Comey: "I serve two standards of Law.
Criminals, rapists, and politicians are above all others.
You must now bow, serve, and obey."
Nixon was never indicted. He resigned as President and Ford preemptively pardoned him.
The problem is, Obama will probably pardon her before he leaves office, should Trump be elected.
Pardon her for what ?
she has not been charged with a crime or found guilty of one
What evidence do you have for this?
I think this is a case for Presentments.
If we could get a large-ish proportion of grand juries to issue Presentments over this, it could shake things up a lot.
The biggest question is this: how does one get in contact with a Grand Jury?
So? There's probably enough stuff there linking the Clinton Foundation to high-level politicians/bureaucrats that we could carve out a large piece of the cancer by following those leads. — So unless Obama pardons the entire government, then there's a lot that can be done.
And if he does issue a mass pardon for the government, We the People will veto that with rule 30-06 and no bag-limit on federal agents. (Seriously, if there is no justice to be had within the rules, then the American people will certainly decide that these are insufferable situations.) all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government
How does this FBI information, evidence that laws were broken, get in front of a federal grand jury, or some other grand jury?
How does this FBI information, evidence that laws were broken, get in front of a federal grand jury, or some other grand jury?
How does this FBI information, evidence that laws were broken, get in front of a federal grand jury, or some other grand jury?
How does this FBI information, evidence that laws were broken, get in front of a federal grand jury, or some other grand jury?
How does this FBI information, evidence that laws were broken, get in front of a federal grand jury, or some other grand jury?
Nixon wasn’t charged with anything either, but Ford pardoned him.
yes he can.... Ford’s pardon of Nixon was worded to cover any and all acts during his entire term of office, even though he had not been charged never mind convicted of any crime.
The only limitation on the Presidential pardon power is that it cannot apply to future events, because then it would in effect be the executive legislating, not allowed by the Constitution. But there is not limit to what a pardon can be written to cover for past events, even events unknown or unspecified at the timee of the pardon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.