Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freedomwinsout
I also have a sneaking suspicion that a lot of companies are jumping fully on board with these "protected class" designations that rely entirely on a person's own self-identification. There's no verification of it, so the employer can start to reduce their minority composition while bolstering the numbers of their protected groups.

Think about it ...

The EEOC walks into a major U.S. corporation where 99% of the employees are white males, and it looks like a clear violation until the HR director says: "Oh, not at all ... we are very diverse. 25% of those white males call themselves women, and another 25% call themselves homosexuals."

28 posted on 07/03/2016 8:08:20 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Sometimes I feel like I've been tied to the whipping post.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

>I also have a sneaking suspicion that a lot of companies are jumping fully on board with these “protected class” designations that rely entirely on a person’s own self-identification. There’s no verification of it, so the employer can start to reduce their minority composition while bolstering the numbers of their protected groups.

>Think about it ...

>The EEOC walks into a major U.S. corporation where 99% of the employees are white males, and it looks like a clear violation until the HR director says: “Oh, not at all ... we are very diverse. 25% of those white males call themselves women, and another 25% call themselves homosexuals.”

The moment this becomes the norm I’m going to list myself as a gay trans/racial/gender black women who is Islamic-curious.


30 posted on 07/03/2016 8:35:44 AM PDT by RedWulf (End Free trade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson