[Alberta's Child]

I also have a sneaking suspicion that a lot of companies are jumping fully on board with these "protected class" designations that rely entirely on a person's own self-identification. There's no verification of it, so the employer can start to reduce their minority composition while bolstering the numbers of their protected groups.

Think about it ...

The EEOC walks into a major U.S. corporation where 99% of the employees are white males, and it looks like a clear violation until the HR director says: "Oh, not at all ... we are very diverse. 25% of those white males call themselves women, and another 25% call themselves homosexuals."

[RedWulf]

>I also have a sneaking suspicion that a lot of companies are jumping fully on board with these “protected class” designations that rely entirely on a person’s own self-identification. There’s no verification of it, so the employer can start to reduce their minority composition while bolstering the numbers of their protected groups.

>Think about it ...

>The EEOC walks into a major U.S. corporation where 99% of the employees are white males, and it looks like a clear violation until the HR director says: “Oh, not at all ... we are very diverse. 25% of those white males call themselves women, and another 25% call themselves homosexuals.”

The moment this becomes the norm I’m going to list myself as a gay trans/racial/gender black women who is Islamic-curious.