Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KeyLargo

I think this may be a planted leak by David Kendall. All FBI criminal interviews are video taped and transcribed . All questions are asked with the answers known.Any intentional misstatement to an FBI agent is a FELONY. It will take days to cross reference her lies with facts.
Also — let me assure everyone that the emails were not the only bite at her apple. There were many questions about bribery and Bill’s Speeches for money followed by her favorable actions as secretary of state. There were questions regarding the washing of donations through the Canadian foundation owned by the Russian that put together her approval of the uranium sales to the Russians. There were questions about her WTO decisions favoring China after bill gave a $750,000 10 minute speech and the money was deposited directly in their community accounts. The Email is smoke and mirrors for her and the MSM for the far more serious corruption and bribery investigation. Over 100 FBI agents are assigned to just that— Not Emails. You think they asked sbout just emails?


62 posted on 07/03/2016 7:10:22 AM PDT by WENDLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WENDLE

Was it true she showed up with 6 or so attorneys for the interview conducted by the FBI? I would imagine one would have been Kendall, another one would have been Cheryl Mills...even after she had been a witness interrogated by Judicial Watch and presumably by the FBI.....

I read that originally the interview was to be at her residence and then last night read that she was escorted to the FBI building. Guess it doesn’t matter which is true as long as it took place. Wonder if her husband was allowed to sit in?????


117 posted on 07/03/2016 9:36:04 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: WENDLE
Yes, lying to the FBI is a felony. But how do they decide who is lying and who is telling the truth?

When Scooter Libby's recollection of a conversation differed from Tim Russert's, the assumption was that Russert was telling the truth and therefore Libby was lying...because the government was out to get Libby.

If Hillary's answers differ from the answers they got from others, they can decide that Hillary's version is the right one...and go after the others for lying (if they are not loyal team members).

Since the "voluntary" interview was just yesterday, I expect they will take some days before reaching a decision to make it look like they are carefully comparing the answers they got from various people.

134 posted on 07/03/2016 2:21:05 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: WENDLE

And you were saying?

FBI JAMES COMEY JUST STATED:

“NO REASONABLE PROSECUTOR WOULD TAKE SUCH A CASE.”

“NO INTENTIONAL MISCONDUCT ACTS FOUND ON THE PART OF HILLARY CLINTON”


142 posted on 07/05/2016 8:23:42 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson