Judicial Watch has sent a FOI about the Bill Clinton Lynch meeting and has demanded that the DOJ investigate and determine what was said at the meeting. Bill Clinton and Lynch may be subpoenaed to testify under oath about what was really said at the meeting.
This will end up in the same round file as everything else.
I can’t recall which Freeper suggested it but I wonder if Bill didn’t somehow plan this out in an attempt to discredit her and deflect heat from Mrs. Bill.
The Clintons are a disease which has no cure once you contract them. They infect everyone they enter into an agreement with. It’s eventually death or jail if you try to shed the disease.
Clintons: scandal, cover deflect, deny, lather, rinse, repeat.
They all practice Taqiyya. There is no telling the truth among the ruling elite.
If you feel are injured by this incident, you may be able to sue under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
Historically, under the doctrine of “sovereign immunity,” you were not permitted to sue the king. Sovereign immunity has carried over to modern times in the form of a general rule that you cannot sue the government — unless the government says you can.
Fortunately, the Federal Tort Claims Act (”FTCA”) allows certain kinds of lawsuits against federal employees who are acting within the scope of their employment. And not doing their job to protect the US from high crimes and misdemeaners is one of them,
If you believe you may have a claim for negligence (careless conduct, or other wrongful or “tortious” conduct) against a federal agency or employee, you must first determine whether you can sue the federal government under the FTCA.
Although the limitations and exceptions are too numerous to review here, here are some general guidelines regarding the limitations on FTCA claims:
• Only federal employees can be sued under the FTCA, not independent contractors hired by the federal government (unless they are treated like employees).
• The negligent or wrongful conduct must have been done within the scope of the defendant’s employment.
• In general, only claims of negligence — as opposed to intentional misconduct — are allowed (though some claims for intentional misconduct can be brought against certain federal law enforcement officers).
• The claim must be based on — and permitted by — the law of the state in which the misconduct occurred.
Despite these and numerous other limitations on FTCA lawsuits, the federal government still pays out millions of dollars each year to compensate FTCA claims. Maybe it will get someone’s attention. And I’ll bet I can find at least one hundred lawyers and a number of organizations that would like to get a piece of Uncle Sugar. (hat tip FReeper redwood)
Has any of JW’s investigations led to anything other than headlines?
At least the National Enquirer sells papers.
Our system has been totally corrupted by allowing the Kenyanesian Usurpation.
When we refused to uphold the natural born citizen clause we forfeited everything.
Why is what Lynch is doing such a surprize ? Why is she even there ? She was up front with the Senate before she was confirmed and told them she would support Obama’s amnesty plan even after it was not being supported by SCOTUS ruling ? Why was she confirmed ?
1. Lynch kept her husband with her. Did she also have access to all recording device?
2. Who gave the “order” to FBI to not allow any photography? Since this was not at the level of national security LEO should NOT have followed through Misuse of security detail
This whole Lynch/Clinton matter was probably a ploy to
take the spotlight off Hitler-y. Then when the FBI cuts
Hitler-y loose and deemed “innocent”, Hitler-y will
holler “SEE?! Harrassing a WOMAN again!” HITLER-Y fully
intends being President, even if the Almighty does not
like it. Bill promised!