Theres three major constitutional problems with the courts argument concerning Title IX imo, two of the three problems blatantly ignoring state sovereignty.
The only sex-related right that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect is voting rights evidenced by the 19th Amendment. And since sex discrimination concerning restrooms is clearly outside the scope of voting rights, the feds are wrongly interfering with state sovereignty on this issue imo.
The states have likewise never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate, tax and spend for INTRAstate schooling purposes.
Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States. Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
So the funding that the feds are threatening to withhold from schools for violating unconstitutional Title IX is arguably state revenues that the corrupt feds stole from the states in the form of unconstitutional federal taxes.
The states need to eliminate the unconstitutional middleman with respect to funding intrastate schools.
Article I, Section 9, Clause 8: No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States [emphasis added]: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
Remember in November !
Patriots need to support Trump by also electing a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that is not only willing to work within its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers to support Trumps vision for making America great again for everybody who is here legally, but will also put a stop to unconstitutional federal interference in state affairs as evidenced by Obamas unconstitutional LGBT restroom policy.
Note that such a Congress will also probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.
I am not aware of any sex discrimination in the use of bathrooms. There are two sexes and two rest rooms in most cases. No one is denied access to rest rooms.
There is no right to use the opposite sex bathroom or to arbitrarily make a personal decision to use the other one. That is anarchy, not freedom from discrimination.