It flew like a rock. . . It did not fly under any lift. What lift it had was pulling it backwards.
....
Regardless, it gained some altitude after the cargo shift and was unbalanced.
Likewise, TWA800 gained altitude after the nose came off according to the NTSB. I find their claim and evidence more convincing than yours.
No where near 1200 feet. There is no energy from anywhere to account for it. . . and the NTSB to this day refuses to provide their calculations about where that energy came from, and to explain how it could climb. It certainly could not climb without engines. Boeing disavowed both scenarios by saying the maximum climb rate for the 747-100 was 3800 feet per minute under ideal conditions and lift with the engines at 100%. Yet the CIA claimed that occurred in 18 seconds (which the math claims it would have to use ALL forward momentum at a maximum 9.7 Gs to achieve, which it obviously did not) and the NTSB claimed 1200 feet in 18 seconds (only 2.7 Gs but requires working engines which were NOT present) as that is within the working parameters of the aircraft were it complete. I think only in Hollywood could that airframe do that, especially with a mortally wounded Center Wing Tank as the cause of the unique explosion that blew off the nose, a Center Wing Tank that is also a Five Spar Box Girder than holds both wings to the fuselage.
“Likewise, TWA800 gained altitude after the nose came off according to the NTSB.”
No, according to the CIA, not the NTSB.
The NTSB's claim and evidence were controlled and directed by the FBI. I guess you explicitly trust the 'government' (even knowing today how crooked they have been all along) ?
Anyway, here is the Ringmaster with his positive proof.
This is the piece allegedly taken from the CWT where the "arcing of metal" allegedly occurred.
Remember, this particular piece would have been at the center of the explosion.
I can guarantee you that that piece of metal has never been in a fire and explosion.