The hell tbey are not.
I see it my search results.
When I use my devices, I get completely different results than I do when using someone elses device or work computers.
Sure, you’re not! I noticed your fingers are crossed when you say that.
Google has half the credibility of Dorkbama the Muslim Dick.
I wonder if it’s possible to “poison the autocomplete well” by putting out sufficient high-profile vituperation about a candidate. Since, as they say, they filter out vituperation, that might leave Trump behind more than Hillary.
This might reflect nothing more than the fact that Trump attracts more explicit hate.
Yes. And google will increase your chocolate ration from 25 to 20 grams a month.
>> Claims to the contrary simply misunderstand how Autocomplete works. Our Autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction with a person’s name. <<
So Google ADMITS that they are inserting themselves as judges of what content they consider “truthful.”
Hitler: We are not being hurting Jews
0bama: We are not letting terrorists in!
Colonel Sanders: Your chickens are safe with us!
They must have changed their standards very recently. Kamau Bell used to do a routine where he googled “Pat Buchanan” and the first suggestion was “Pat Buchanan racist.” He may have typed in an r, but there was no ban on negative results coming up first. “Donald Trump r” also, according to various accounts, yielded “Donald Trump racist.” Now it doesn’t.
Is Hillary Clinton left handed
Is Hillary Clinton vegan
Is Hillary Clinton dead
Is Hillary Clinton good
Is Hillary Clinton a superdelgate
Is Hillary Clinton going to win
Is Hillary Clinton running for president in 2016
Is Donald Trump married
Is Donald Trump left handed
Is Donald Trump running for president
Is Donald Trump dead
Is Donald Trump electable
Is Donald Trump a draft dodger
Is Donald Trump a democrat
Is Donald Trump racist cnn
Is Donald Trump racist quora
Their statement may be accurate but the determination of offensive is subjective. Also the more important problem is systematic bias within the code at Google. There's little chance that the code has any blatant "if Hillary Clinton then" statements in it. But any reasonably clever programmer can make sure there are equivalent code statements to protect liberals from criticism while trashing conservatives.
Yes, Google is Satan.
He’s really mean and doesn’t have good pictures on holidays.
You can tell the anti military, anti conservative, anti AMERICAN bias with the holiday cartoons they post.
I delete everything googlE that I find. Ixquick is my search engine.
My paper airplane webpage is practically invisible in Google search and I have a Google AdSense account linked to it. Type in paper airplanes and look for xplanes4u.com and see how many abstract other things pop up before you ever see xplanes4u.com.
I had trouble with my lap top and had to use my husbands to google how to fix it....he has yahoo and when I searched for freerepublic it showed everything but.....
Yes they lie.
Being a liar seems to be in these days along with hypocrites and traitors.
Google lies, the truth dies.
A little while ago I Googled——” Does Hillary use a teleprompter?” The links that came up all had Trump’s name on them. Nothing about Hillary and prompters. Bing was much better, altho I never got a direct answer.
My opinion is influenced by my knowledge that all leftists lie all the time.