Wait, weren't black men usually the victim of that kind of thing? Or will libfags make their new laws only harsh on white people?
True enough.
Author jad to get the “White Privilege” thingee in.
Don't go to parties alone. Make sure your "friends" who go with you are really your friends. Look out for each other. Do not drink from anything which is already open. Do not drink any drinks that are made for you. Watch out for sweet drinks that may mask the alcohol content. Watch out for kids at the party who are not students. Etc................
This is just a general list I told my Daughter and does not necessarily apply to this case.
Banks said that the consideration for the negative impact on the rapist only deepens the suffering of the victim and diminishes her voice in the case. He’s pictured in 2012 after his conviction was overturned:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3630119/Brian-Banks-wrongfully-convicted-rape-teen-cites-privilege-Stanford-rape-case.html
like the US legal profession didn’t have serious concerns before?? Oxymoron: honest attorney or, honest politician
He raped her.
The Law is a scam - people’s personal preferences dressed up in abstractions and weasel words that can be twisted any old way to justify whatever the lawyers and judges want at any given minute - just ask Roberts about how he rewrote Obamacare to make it “legal”.....
The Title 9 reinterpretation several years ago by Obama’s minions is truly a violation of the Constitution.
* Rape tribunals are run by commissions that are judge, jury and investigator. We separate judges from police to minimize evidence in interviews and evidence collection
* Rape tribunals are usually done by women’s studies departments - that’s biased against men.
* Accused parties rarely know the charges against them, a right that goes back to the Magna Carta.
* No right to legal defender, and often insufficient notice that this is a legal hearing so you rarely can invite a friend who IS an attorney
* Limits or flat out denial of right to cross-examine, in the name of not hurting the feelings of the accuser
* Limits or refusal of evidence that proves someone’s innocence, regular refusal to let someone bring in multiple witnesses
* A barely 50%+.01 standard of guilty that is less than the courts
* If the accused is found innocent, the accuser can appeal - violation of double jeopardy
* They can kick you out of housing, jobs and the university for minor infractions that are not violations of the law
* Anyone can report a sexual misconduct, and tribunals go forward with investigations; already case where a woman said it was consensual but a female friend reported a hickey, another man investigated because he looked like a girl’s rapist a thousand miles away, another where a female academic was investigated for writing a paper criticizing rape culture stats
Justice is not the aim of the criminal justice system, especially in the court.
Defense lawyers view it as a game, something to “win” regardless of how evil their client is.
I read the letter written by the victim to her rapist. If it is to believed (and I remember it correctly) she had pine straw in her vagina and rectum. Also, one of the guys that caught the rapist said he wouldn’t talk about what he saw but that it was very unpleasant.
I think the “rapist” was guilty of a violent assault. That is a crime whether or not rape is involved.
Who gives a flying donut hole what the effect is on a rapist? Those bullshyt treatment programs make them worse. Stop categorizing sex crimes as an illness. Bury them under the jail.
I’d be checking the oh so lenient judge out for similar crimes.
“The Stanford Rape Case Raises Serious Questions for the Legal Profession”
So it’s the decision of “the legal profession” - no doubt academics - that the rights of an accused person should be set aside.
And of course, since people are traumatized by all sorts of crimes, not just rape, the rights of an accused person should be “properly” limited in all sorts of other situations as well. Just as “free speech” is too damaging now, too.
Ludicrous sentence and should result in tossing the judge to the curb as well as being overturned.
When I was just a kid in the 40s and early 50s in Texas, a rape conviction meant the death penalty. I’ve observed over the years how penalties for serious crimes have been lessened to little more than a slap on the hand. Shame.
No a/c in those days so in the Summers neighbors would gather in our shady side yard after supper, with lawn chairs, ice chests and blankets to visit and let the houses cool down enough to go to sleep around 10 pm. We little kids would chase lightnin’ bugs and play hide-n-seek.
The men all had their pistols or long guns and the adults talked about the events of the time. One major topic I recall was the rash of rapists in the area.
Since the houses were so hot, people raised their windows on opposite sides of the house to create a draft of air at night. Our portion of the city was about 98% white.
The rapes were being committed by primarily black men who would remove a window screen and climb through the window, so it was obvious that they had cased the area and knew the woman would be alone (many men were working second shift at defense contractors at the time). Most women then didn’t have guns or know how to handle them.
Neighborhood men would get together and go through the neighborhood nailing the window screens to prevent easy removal. ....It was a time when any black man seen in the area was at risk; ...other than the one on a wagon full of watermelons drawn by a mule! He reminded me of Uncle Remus!
Sorry for the memory dump here. Strange how some odd topic will trigger those old memories...
6 months in the county jail and a lifetime sentence to be known as a sexual offender. hmmmm. how many months in the county jail is hillary going to serve for a lifetime of crime, treason, and murder? none? yep. that’s right. none. how many months will slick willie serve for his lifetime career of forcible rape and molestation? none? thats right. its not what you do that counts. its who you are.