No sympathy for Hillary, but if I was running for office and my loser brother-in-law was arrested, it would be irrelevant to my fitness for the position.
Maybe he needs to start brewing Roger Beer......
True that, however it does serve as a reminder of the Clinton tag-a-longs from the last time they were in the WH.
Perhaps irrelevant to you and me, but, what a family!
Not irrelevant. Clinton pardoned Roger years ago and now he is driving around drunk. Could have killed someone. If he had, the blood would have been on Clinton’s hands.
Bet he gets ANOTHER pardon.
I’m pretty sure carter’s hillbilly brother was a factor in jimmeh’s landslide loss. After all they named a beer after him and that was his claim to fame. Check out “Billy Beer”.
No matter. Liberals truly don’t care about candidates’ problems. All liberals care about is to keep their free stuff flowing. They would truly vote for Charles Manson if that’s what it took to keep abortion legal, promote faggism, etc.
But rumor has it he’s her cocaine supplier so Hillary won’t be making any of her wacky faces anytime soon.
I totally agree. Spouse and kids are fairly relevant because they indicate the choices you’ve made and the values you’ve instilled in your kids. Even then, kids do crazy things. But an in-law is beyond your control. Almost everyone has a crazy in-law in the family.
OTOH, for dems, criminal activity is rarely an issue and often a resume enhancer.