I despise title 9. It ruins men’s athletic programs. It really hurt our family’s sport on college level.
Of course girls should play sports. But since the general public doesn’t want to watch girls at most sports, they won’t be moneymakers. Why don’t all these feminist companies donate for women’s programs and even some men’s programs that don’t make money?
Because title ix is not about sports; it’s about control.
>>Of course girls should play sports. But since the general public doesn’t want to watch girls at most sports, they won’t be moneymakers. Why don’t all these feminist companies donate for women’s programs and even some men’s programs that don’t make money?<<
The only women’s sports worth watching are volleyball, tennis, 1/2 of golf, and volleyball.
The rest are just BORING and the participants are UGLY.
and as long as women are 50% of the population and pay taxes and probably make up most of the college students then they should have equal opportunity..
it is NOT or should not be a primary motive for HS or college sports to "make money"....
sports that "make money" have basically ruined sports.
we regularly fill up our local college arena for the womens BB team...its fantastic...
men's athletic programs are "ruined" only because of the greed of men's athletic programs....they build more "facilities" for men's teams on a continual basis...they can't cram enough video games, sauna's, whirlpools,juice bars, closed circuit tvs etc into a modern football locker room to meet demand...ala Oregone...