Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Just have a feeling that this is kind of baked in the cake already
1 posted on 06/03/2016 6:49:50 AM PDT by LRoggy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LRoggy

I’d like to see both the Clintons and the odumbo’s be put in prison for treason or sent to some tiny deserted island, gone from history here in the U.S. We would all be better of without any of them, past, present or future.


2 posted on 06/03/2016 6:54:04 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LRoggy

Nah. He’s more concerned about Trump dismantling his “legacy”. Such as it is.


3 posted on 06/03/2016 6:55:55 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LRoggy

The fix is in but the joke is on OBuggery, Hillary and the rest of the NWO globalists as they have been outflanked.


4 posted on 06/03/2016 6:56:08 AM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LRoggy

Tthe long simmering feud between the Clinton Crime Family and the shadowy cabal of leftists for whom Obama is a spokesperson.

Fixed it.


5 posted on 06/03/2016 6:57:19 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LRoggy
If Trump is successful and wins, it is time to expose the Communists who run the ComDem Party.

That cabal is the most devastating thing I've seen in my life.

6 posted on 06/03/2016 6:57:51 AM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LRoggy
...Obama holds ALL the cards here. He is much younger and will be around a long time and will be able to almost act as a shadow government due to the popularity the MSM has for him, regardless of whether it is a Democrat or Republican administration.

Al Gore was going to head a "shadow government", too. The age / longevity statement is also meaningless speculation - accidents happen.

9 posted on 06/03/2016 7:04:39 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LRoggy

We all know already that there is a reason Hillary has not been indicted a long time ago. Obama has control of the Justice Dept. Look at Lois Lerner. She also walked. Why is that?
I’m thinking Obama had to know what Hillary was up to in funneling bribes to the Clinton Foundation. He probably got his cut, otherwise why allow it?
So, he would have to have a way of shielding his own culpability in order to out her. Plus I’m sure she already had blackmail material piled up on him before he ever gained office. Obama would have to find a way to neutralize that threat before indicting her.


10 posted on 06/03/2016 7:06:45 AM PDT by tinamina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LRoggy


Why do Google and Facebook have such ready and frequent access to the Obama WH?
12 posted on 06/03/2016 7:09:34 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck ( Socialism consumes EVERYTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LRoggy

I came up with a different take, that I’ve previously posted, on the upcoming election that may be an explanation for whats going on. It seems on the face of it to be quite outrageous but really, what can you put past this _resident and the complicit lame stream media, that would provide support.

I wrote, “A new theory that I have not heard is that _resident Obama will wait until its to late to allow substitute nominees before having Hil’liar’y indicted.
He will then suspend the elections until such time as the process for a subsequent election can be created, say about oh, 4 years or so.

The _resident, being very _residential will pardon everyone related to the incidents for the good of the country and let all his friends (pronounced political lackey’s) skate free and clear.

YOU HEARD IT HEAR FIRST - AND - You can choose for yourselves whether or not to put on your tin foil hats.”

ps. Don’t forget the old adage, ‘once a tyrant always a tyrant.” So that might be only the beginning.


14 posted on 06/03/2016 7:10:57 AM PDT by Kalam (<: The answer is 42 :>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LRoggy
Make no mistake about it, Valarie Jarrett and Michelle Obama run the White House. Barack is largely a lazy ass who's more interested in watching ESPN.

That said, the two absolutely hate the Clintons. Michelle cannot wait to get the hell out of the White House while Valarie will be dragged out kicking and screaming. Barack will be happy to sit on the sidelines raking in cash for speaking fees and will be a loud mouth in the press for the next 4-8 years.

It stands to reason that Clinton's dilemma really is up in the air. Obama may choose to let the Justice department loose. Lynch will follow orders no matter what. If that happens she AND Bill are screwed. We're talking a massive RICO case here. That would seal the Clinton's fate and they will fade off into obscurity (and prison and bankruptcy eventually).

If Sanders wins CA, even if he comes close to winning, the convention is going to be an absolute mess. I doubt it will rival 1968 but it could come very close. If Clinton can't completely seal the deal on the first vote it's going to be a complete and utter free for all.

Keep in mind that Obama (Jarrett) has preferred a Biden/Warren ticket all along.

17 posted on 06/03/2016 7:19:42 AM PDT by Snowybear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LRoggy

I don’t think you have it quite right.

It’s not that Hillary had a crappy unsecured server to hide stuff from Obama.

It’s that Hillary had a crappy unsecured server to hide stuff from US.

And Obama and Valjar went along with it because it gave them an ace ‘hole card’ they could play on Hillary when they needed to.


20 posted on 06/03/2016 7:31:47 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Chuck Norris finally met his match in Donald Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LRoggy
Does anyone doubt that Barack Obama would sacrifice one election cycle to keep power behind the scenes?

If he does, it will be Revolution.

24 posted on 06/03/2016 7:38:49 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (#BlackOlivesMatter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LRoggy

Compelling prognostication you e-penned.

How the hell have we sunken so low that we’ve let the media effectively desensitize the American people to all this corruption?
Eliminating Hillary from the race and convicting her would be so easy if 1% of current and former military servicemen and defense contractors with security clearances raised a social media and public protest storm making it clear that Hillary’s abuse of secret government data would unquestionably result in a long term prison sentence for anyone else.

I have a Brilliant idea to destroy Hillary’s presidential run.
Trump should bring military veterans on stage from all five branches of service and dramatically pose to them these questions -

Trump (on stage, to his audience):
“People, we have here military veteran representatives from the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force and the Coast Guard.
Thank you for your service and sacrifice for our country. Can we have a round of applause for everyone who has honorably served our country in our military?”
(Big round of applause and hollering)

Trump: “I have some questions for each of you servicemen. Please tell this audience what would happen if there was clear evidence you repeatedly mishandled sensitive national security information over the course several years, involving thousands of sensitive government emails you redirected to a personal email server.
Please respond to the following questions”

“1. Would you immediately lose your security clearance and be forbidden from further access to sensitive national security information? Yes, or no?”

“2. Is there any doubt you would be tried and convicted for violating federal data security violations? Yes, or no?”

“3. Please tell us where you would be spending many of your years as a result of your conviction and sentencing?
Army vet: “prison”
Navy vet: “prison”
Marine vet: “prison”
Air force vet: “prison”
Coast guard vet: “prison”

Trump:
“There you have it people.
From our vets who know well about how sensitive matters of national security Must be handled, and what would happen to them and Anyone else who had the nerve to misuse their access to national security information.
Can you say Hillary for Imprisonment?!”

Wash, rinse, repeat at Every Trump rally.

RE: “Just have a feeling that this is kind of baked in the cake already”


26 posted on 06/03/2016 7:42:03 AM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LRoggy
And then you have the ultimate get even. Obama gives the Justice Department the ‘wink and a nod’ to indict Hillary for the classification issue and maybe even a RICO charge on the Clinton Foundation. Between the November election and the New Year.

Or, as I have been arguing for some time now, well before the election and perhaps before the Dem Convention.

Do it Obama. Make the call to Loretta. Give her the word: INDICT.

30 posted on 06/03/2016 8:17:37 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Still a Cruz Fan but voting for Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LRoggy

No fix is in and I speak with confidence.


38 posted on 06/03/2016 9:11:40 AM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson