Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pakistan Fails to Seal F-16 Deal
The Diplomat ^ | 5/31/2016 | Franz-Stefan Gady

Posted on 06/01/2016 7:08:47 AM PDT by mac_truck

Pakistan failed to move forward with the purchase of eight U.S.-made F-16C/D Block-52 fighter aircraft following a dispute over financing, Dawn reported on May 28.

According to an unidentified source Pakistan failed to provide a so-called Letter of Acceptance for the procurement of the eight fighter jets by May 24 and the offer expired.

“Pakistan decided not to fully fund the case with national funds, so the terms of sale have now expired,” the source told Dawn.

U.S. lawmakers have been blocking financing for the eight F-16s under the so-called Foreign Military Financing (FMF), with the result that Pakistan would have needed to pay $700 million instead of the original $270 million for the aircraft–a price increase of two-and-a-half times the original cost.

U.S. lawmakers have repeated voiced their concerns that the fighter jets would not be used to fight insurgents within Pakistan but rather be deployed to deter India.

It remains highly unlikely that Islamabad will proceed given congressional opposition. However, Pakistan’s ambassador to the United States, Jalil Abbas Jilani, said last Saturday that “a dead-end has not been reached as yet.”

It was only in February that the U.S. State Department approved the possible sale of the F-16 fighter jets to Pakistan with the Pentagon’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notifying Congress.

(Excerpt) Read more at thediplomat.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: aerospace; block52; f16; f16c; f16d; india; lockheed; pakistan
Dawn is a Pakistani Daily Newspaper.
1 posted on 06/01/2016 7:08:47 AM PDT by mac_truck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mac_truck

Frankly, for a country that harbored Osama Bin Laden for years, on the front doorstep of its own “West Point,” we shouldn’t be selling them ANY weapons at all. We should instead be giving India advanced weapons to overtake them.


2 posted on 06/01/2016 7:11:43 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck

Why are we selling anything to Pakistan?! They, like Saudi Arabia and India, and others are not allies.


3 posted on 06/01/2016 7:15:04 AM PDT by Reno89519 (Like herpes, Cruz can always flare up again. Treat with Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck

Pakistan is our enemy, not our friend.

We should goad them into war with Turkey somehow. that would be a win win.


4 posted on 06/01/2016 7:15:21 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan (Don't be a lone wolf. Form up small leaderlesss cells ASAP !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

It will be interesting to see where Pakistan turns next for military hardware, if this deal has actually fallen through.


5 posted on 06/01/2016 7:21:22 AM PDT by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: T-Bone Texan
We should goad them into war with Turkey somehow.

Or Iran...

6 posted on 06/01/2016 7:24:47 AM PDT by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck

Good.


7 posted on 06/01/2016 7:28:29 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck

Pakistan is NOT our friend.
Regardless of how much money some corporations make.


8 posted on 06/01/2016 7:45:13 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (Go Trump, Give em hell BABY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
U.S. lawmakers have been blocking financing for the eight F-16s under the so-called Foreign Military Financing (FMF), with the result that Pakistan would have needed to pay $700 million instead of the original $270 million for the aircraft–a price increase of two-and-a-half times the original cost. U.S. lawmakers have repeated voiced their concerns that the fighter jets would not be used to fight insurgents within Pakistan but rather be deployed to deter India.

9 posted on 06/01/2016 7:46:04 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (I'll tell you what's wrong with society -- no one drinks from the skulls of their enemies anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mac_truck

China


10 posted on 06/01/2016 11:05:39 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (Fear is the mind killer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

You might be right, although it would be a step backwards in terms of quality of hardware imo.

I’m also not sure China would subsidize their military expenditures to the same degree the United States has.


11 posted on 06/01/2016 11:33:31 AM PDT by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck; headstamp 2

Pakistan will continue to buy from their oldest ally: China. Nearly 70% of Pakistan’s military hardware and its nuclear and missile tech is of Chinese origin. Since the 1970s, the U.S. has been an add-on supplier from whom they would prefer to buy, not their main source.


12 posted on 06/02/2016 11:10:58 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson