Posted on 05/26/2016 8:47:26 PM PDT by DarthVader
Jim Sullivan helped design the AR-15 back in 1957, and later the Ruger M77, the Stoner 63, Ruger Mini-14 and the crowd favorite Ultimax 100. Most recently he was the brains behind Surefires 60 and 100 round quad-stack AR-15 magazines.
(Excerpt) Read more at thefirearmblog.com ...
Your point is moot with lefties simply because I they do not believe the common person has the right to defend themselves. The more elite the leftist is, the less he will want you to defend yourself. Think Hitler, Stalin, and Mao who were the most elite of their era. Guns in the hands of peasants were unthinkable and those caught with them got a little more than jail time.
The .223 is a mid-range varmint cartridge,serious varmint hunters use a .22-250 or something similar.
Agreed!!
It depends on who you are fighting. Some foes care little for fallen comrades.
I saw a hit piece on guns from HBO thirty years ago. Never watched them again. Still don’t have HBO.
The MSM has been churning out anti-gun scripts and “documentaries” since 1968. Before that time it was leftist newspapers that railed against gun ownership.
***This is the old lark about the .223 being so deadly***
That would mean that the Remington .222 is less deadly and the Remington .222 magnum is more deadly! OH, I’m going to faint! Get the salts!
But then, back in the 1950s, Britain wanted to adopt a .17 cal!
“This is the old lark about the .223 being so deadl”
Only inexperienced kids trying to sound knowledgeable claim the 223 is not deadly. It’s an old Internet argument by the inexperienced kids.
HBO = Homo Buggery OBotulism (Obama)
or are you buying in the anti gun propaganda that .223 is way to much overkill for citizens..the king of super "mankiller" round that way more powerful then you typical hunting round?
From StG44 to the AK to the AR15 the idea was a reduced size round..an intermediate cartridge vs the full power military round...
“intermediate cartridge vs the full power military round...”
There is no such thing as “full power military”. None. It is strictly a matter of opinion.
There is no such thing as full power military. None. It is strictly a matter of opinion.
I’m speaking from commonly accepted terms
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_rifle
Tell them the answer will dawn on them if they use their computer to access the Internet while drinking a glass of Tang.
See if they get it.
“Im speaking from commonly accepted terms”
Internet terms, not practical ones used in the real-=world.
The Internet, the resource where everything is known to anyone yet no one knows anything.
Wow...your really full of shit
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.