Posted on 05/21/2016 5:48:45 AM PDT by HomerBohn
It will be interesting to see what precedence has been set due to this scandal. Each time I hear about this, the number of violations increase, not decrease. She could be indicted on a number of different violations, so how would these be separated and what does it mean for all others who have been convicted for the same crimes.
Think of poor Scooter Libby who was sent to prison for nothing!
Oh, come on. Really. Anyone who can’t remember what they had for dinner on May 27, 2003 needs to be in jail. Heck, even I keep some notes. /s
This certainly tells us they are royalty.... the scum of the earth, treated as such.. while the rest of us are held accountable.
This is the kind of cowardice that gives license to such as the Clintons and Obamas to carry on their depredations. They know, with metaphysical certainty, if they’re bold enough in their corruption that those who should stop them will be cowed by the enormity of the task. And each click of the ratchet thast is never turned back takes us ever closer to Mugabe’s Zimbabwe or Maduro’s Venezuela
Gohmert supported Ted Cruz for president, but said on Fox Business that he would support Donald Trump if Trump apologized for his treatment of Cruz and Carly Fiorina.
Louie, what are you doing? It was a primary fight. It’s over. You don’t ask your party nominee to apologize. It only weakens him. Set your sights on Hillary.
OK, Freeper Legal Eagles:
What is standard FBI policy?
Do they just issue a report and hand it to Justice?
Do they make recommendations?
Indict or don’t indict?
List of confirmed violations of the law?
What do they normally do?
It’s good to have dreams. It helps us strive to better things. But let’s be realistic, if clinton loses the general election and doesn’t throw any shade in the president’s general direction, he will likely issue a pardon as he leaves office.
Because trying someone for illegal, security destroying acts should always hinge on whether or not you support or insult someone in power.
If this ends up being the correct scenario, what possible grounds do citizens have for trust in government?
bf more info
If Comey takes the route Gohmert suggests then he is NOT a “straight-up” guy.
Fear not, I’m sure the Bureau would treat any of us with the same consideration they’ll give Clinton. /s/
By the way, Gohmert is a moron.
This IS the correct scenario.
Where have you been?
Absolutely, 100 percent, dead on. Exactly what I was thinking.
Once again it’s obvious that the old fixaroo is in. Comey the neutral public servant, my foot!
“Laws for thee but not for me.”
However, he explained that he didn’t believe she would be, unless she spoke negatively about the president.....In other words, we no longer have a nation of laws.
Kabuki theater agitprop to move pieces on the collectivist chessboard mind game.
The FBI most certainly recommends indictments.
Who knows WTF Gohmert is doing here.
http://www.yahoo.com/news/fbi-recommends-charges-against-ex-cia-chief-petraeus-234349055.html
Thanks for my new wallpaper
Surprise,surprise.........................................................................yawn.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.