Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fireman15; pfony1; All
If that actually were the case, which I kind of doubt, who cares anyway.

Who cares? Who cares if biological males are granted access to women's shower rooms? You have no problem with that? Seriously??

And don't pretend it isn't happening. Google it.

The ultra-liberal Charlotte Observer newspaper just came out with an editorial that basically said that girls just need to "get over" undressing and showering next to biological males. It's just (so they claim) the next logical step of the sexual revolution, following after gay marriage.

You have no problem with that?

15 posted on 05/20/2016 11:21:38 AM PDT by tjd1454
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: tjd1454

You have no problem with that?

Google it? Is that how you live your life? Checking with the leftists at Google to see if something you have never seen actually exists in the real world? That is pathetic if you ask me. So just one question... have you ever seen a transgender person in a public restroom YOURSELF? And if you did see a transgender person in a public restroom that was making other people uncomfortable were you to bashful to confront the person? Because I can tell you that I am old enough and my wife is old enough that if we saw someone in a restroom that was making other people uncomfortable we would either confront them ourselves or report them to the staff.

If a tree falls in the forest and no one sees it or hears it fall, should we still make a law that says its illegal for trees to fall in the forest? This is a nonissue that is being used solely for the purpose of distracting people from things that actually matter.


17 posted on 05/20/2016 11:41:16 AM PDT by fireman15 (The USA will be toast if the Democrats are able to take the Presidency in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: tjd1454

Isn’t it strange that the Charlotte Observer pontificates that scores [or hundreds or thousands] of real girls NEED to “get over” their discomfort at showering next to biological males but that those same few “transgender” males need NOT make any effort to “get over” their “discomfort” at being rejected by real girls?

This DOJ policy of sacrificing the rights of the majority to the “demands” of a few is obviously UN-CONSTITUTIONAL.

Insanity is like that!


23 posted on 05/20/2016 1:57:35 PM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: tjd1454

Isn’t it strange that the Charlotte Observer pontificates that scores [or hundreds or thousands] of real girls NEED to “get over” their discomfort at showering next to biological males but that those same few “transgender” males need NOT make any effort to “get over” their “discomfort” at being rejected by real girls?

This DOJ policy of sacrificing the rights of the majority to the “demands” of a few is obviously UN-CONSTITUTIONAL.

Insanity is like that!


24 posted on 05/20/2016 1:58:19 PM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: tjd1454

Isn’t it strange that the Charlotte Observer pontificates that scores [or hundreds or thousands] of real girls NEED to “get over” their discomfort at showering next to biological males but that those same few “transgender” males need NOT make any effort to “get over” their “discomfort” at being rejected by real girls?

This DOJ policy of sacrificing the rights of the majority to the “demands” of a few is obviously UN-CONSTITUTIONAL.

Insanity is like that!


27 posted on 05/20/2016 2:21:32 PM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson