He’s dead. His family mourns him. What practical purpose to such a story?
“He’s dead. His family mourns him. What practical purpose to such a story?”
Autopsies reveal pathologies. Some of those are communicable, and it is best to be aware of them.
“He’s dead. His family mourns him. What practical purpose to such a story?”
I agree. Whatever he was like politically in life, he was facing death, and had to have been sincere in his belief or he wouldn’t have spent his last moments doing this. Most of us in this nation want to believe in people, and from a Christian heritage perspective truly believe in turning the other cheek and not being judgmental. That said, this situation is more complex IMHO because we also have an obligation to protect innocence, and to stop groups of people from harming others. That MSN would see fit to use this man’s death and his actions before death to attack a political candidate is unethical ‘journalism’, and disgusting.
Party over principle.
To liberals like Bennett, party is religion.
For whatever reason, his family wanted to share this story.
It serves to show how pathetic Republicans are
REALLY?
>He’s dead. His family mourns him. What practical purpose to such a story?
Gives another entry for those of us whom keep a ‘Who’s grave to piss upon’ bucket-list.