He is the obamanation of America’s desolation and may have done us in. We are on the brink of disaster in America.
How do you justify separate men’s and women’s bathrooms at all, and at the same time justify this newly discovered “right”?
This is a distraction.
Once North Carolina (or any other state government or local school district) decides to forego all federal money to run the local schools, it will be very interesting to see what other federal mandates they can ignore.
Huxley predicted this in Chapter 3 of “Brave New World”:
Gutless School Boards will rush to accommodate this lunacy.
I didn’t know so many men in The U.S. had potty problems!
Never got any potty training? Don’t know which way to point their peckers? Is there a handicap-welfare-check for that? Or is Obama the only one with this problem and is projecting his own confusion on the total population?
If a male FEELS that he is female, he needs to reach down and FEEL again.
How many women are demanding to pee in the men’s room?
Moochie made him do it.
I was told that directives are only issued for US security interests, and they had to be approved by the National Security Council. Am I missing something? Correct me if I am wrong, please!
If it does not have the force of law, then the threat to withhold funds does not have the force of law either.
Duh!
This has nothing to do with bathrooms and trannies, it’s about maintaining federal control. Power.
Be careful not to miss seeing the forest for these trees! Our pResident has not lost his mind; he and his minions want us to lose ours, I.e., due to repeated assaults on our way of life. These body blows to the “body politic” are like those of a prizefighter pummeling his opponent in the last stages of a fight, e.g, when he has him on the ropes. Each of these final blows does not have to be very hard, I.e., when compared to a knockout punch, but the strategy is not to give his opponent any time to react before the next blow lands. It is an effective strategy, I.e., looking at current events, we see the focus change rapidly from supposed racism, to supposed homophobia, to supposed Islamophobia, to a supposed phobia of those who are transsexual, etc. There is scant time to deal with one topic in a rational manner before the next one becomes predominant. And that is no accident!
These minions include the most of the media, I.e., those who conveniently discard their ethics when it comes to reporting on anything that, if the truth be told, would weaken the stranglehold of the socialists and thieves in power. This collusion is like the roots of the various trees in this journalistic forest. The solution is to first correctly label the socialists, theives and other miscreants currently on power who hide behind masks of obfuscation. I plead with you to be clear as I am and not give them any benefit of a doubt. The vast majority of them are hard core socialists and thieves who are enabled by lesser lights in the media.
The proof of the foregoing accusation is easy, especially if we look back a decade or so. The Obama Administration, like the Clinton Administration before it, enjoys such favorable treatment from most of the media and the Bush Administration had such a difficult and adversarial relationship with them.
I could cite thousands of examples, but the bigger point that I do not wish to to detract from by citing them, is that it is high time we figuratively assault the so-called Main Stream Media in much the same way as the winning boxer mentioned above, as well as cut off their ad revenue. We have to expose the tangled roots of these trees and thier connections to these socialists and theives. For example, we must ask these media figures why they don’t report on , or why they downplay this news item or hype another one, I.e., why they try to portray these socialists and theives in the best possible light. We must figuratively rip away the masks of supposed objectivity they wear by asking them, what is in it for them? For example, do they expect to be elevated to a position of power and influence like George Stephanopolus, or are they expecting a cut of the loot?
The headline is intentionally misleading, and is written in such a way as to promote Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton.
This is not “Obama’s bathroom policy.”
This is “The Democrat’s bathroom policy.”
The president is focusing the power of his office on bathrooms. Hard to believe this madness is happening.
Hopefully the disastrous Obama experience will convince a sufficient number of people to vote for Trump and that he will focus his energies and prestige on solving more pressing national problems.
You all do understand that this does not apply to just bathrooms? It should be more aptly titled: Obama’s Coed Shower Room Madness. A local said that is 2 nine and ten year old daughters showering with 14 and 15 year old boys was a “teachable moment” so the madness is not just with 0bama ...
Incredibly stupid ruse to create confusion while our country faces real, very serious problems.
Not as complicated as some are making it. Zero has 250 some days left. Moochelle/Michael is pressuring him to ease her/his transition to private life. The little candyass is doing what he’s told.
øbama’s own homosexuality is behind this bathroom fixation.
The Creep in Chief
It’s no longer “federal” law at work, but “feral” law.
Obama: takeing the “de” out of “federal”.
