Posted on 05/10/2016 5:30:34 AM PDT by Liz
EXCERPT---What Pagliano Likely Knows / Bryan Pagliano can shed light on several issues:
<><> Pagliano’s dual role as 1) a tax-paid US government employee, and, 2) Hillary's personal employee, opens a whole new arena for investigation, similar the ongoing scrutiny of Hillary aide, Huma Abedin (Huma worked simultaneously for 1) the State Department, 2) the Clinton Foundation, 3) Hillary herself, and, Teneo---a private company closely tied to both Clintons. She also billed herself as a "private consultant."
<><> What was Pagliano’s day-to-day State Dept job? What did he actually do, not just his job description, but actual work accomplishments? Is there a paper trail showing he did any actual work at all, or was the State “job” just a make-work position to get him on the tax-paid payroll in return for his services to Clintons?
<><> Pagliano listed himself on LinkedIn as a political-appointee saying he “Serves as strategic advisor and special projects manager to the Chief Technology Officer (CTO) / Deputy Chief Information Officer (DCIO) overseeing the operations of the Information Resource Management (IRM) bureau.”
<><> Pagliano beingemployed at such a high level inside State’s IT structure assures that State’s most senior info officers knew about Clinton’s email setup, and apparently did not, or were not, able to stop it. Unless Brian never told his supervisor about his "other" job.
<><> What was going on inside the State Department vis-a-vis Hillary's email server? Who knew about it? When did they know? Was it ever vetted/approved, and if so, by whom?
<><> Were objections raised by security personnel and how were those objections dealt with? Who is on the complete list of people who had email addresses on the server?
<><> What discussions took place inside State regarding the presence of classified information on the server? Were objections ever raised from outside State, say from the White House or the intel community?
<><> Pagliano can also speak to 1) what security measures if any were in place on Clinton’s server, and, 2) when they were instituted.
<><> Tech-savvy Pagliano had visibility into Hillary's server logs, showing any attacks or penetrations into the server.
<><> Pagliano, as a State Department employee under Hillary, had access to the State Department computer systems.
<><> Pagliano currently works as a computer contractor for State, and still has access to State Department computer systems. Has he ever been asked by Clinton to use his positions to gain information she would ordinarily not have access to, or to which she did not want her name attached?
<><> Pagliano may have knowledge of where any backups of the server are, shedding light on what emails were deleted by Clinton before her “full disclosure” of what was in fact a highly curated batch of documents.
CONCLUSIONS There is a lot to learn from Bryan Pagliano. His testimony could be like when the Feds turn a Mafia accountant, a low-level guy with access to the family jewels.
========================================
BONUS: WRT the State Department’s Chief Information Officer, who should have stopped the Clinton email server? Well, well, she retired from State a few months before Hillary left, into a nice job at the IMF. It pays to be a winner!
Brian Pagliano has been invited to a picnic in Ft. Marcy Park.
N-i-c-e take......methinks you nailed it.
I've come to the the conclusion that corrupt career politicians lacking any real oversight or accountability the last 7 years ran amok and developed more ways to milk the American taxpayer and divert those tax dollars into their own pockets than at any other time in U.S. history. One way is probably using brother-in-law (or friend) subcontractor kickback schemes.
About three weeks ago the FBI told State to halt any investigation. FBI was already up to date on the destruction by State. Hopefully they have “some information”. Either way this doesn’t appear to hinder the entire Investigation. I think this is being done to destroy the IT guys credibility.
I do think he is now in danger. They only have his words against Hillary & Obama. The entire event(at present), is a smoke screen.
Moving money around always leaves a paper/electronic trail. Like the check-cashing scheme few years back, many many of these lowlife elected types were involved.
================================================
REFERENCE Banks rigorously drill money laundering/terrorist funding MO into the heads of all bank employees. EVERY transaction -- especially by those who are politically involved -- is subject to scrutiny.
Every suspected transaction will have a report filled out and filed about it. If it involves international transfers and shady characters (think of the latest list of the Friends of Bill) the issues - each and every one -- would be escalated to senior management.
The bank reports themselves are required to be on file for 5 years. Discussion of such reports -- even their existence -- is strictly controlled and generally forbidden. Yet they remain on record.
WRT THE CLINTONS---there is no way -- categorically N.O. way -- in a Patriot-Act world that anyone could have pulled off what is alleged against the Clinton Foundation. Unless it was a Clinton, acting with the express complicity of some very high-ups at some very big banks.
I suppose it's conceivable that suspicious activity reports were duly passed on to OCC (bank oversight agencies)....and whomever else has jurisdiction and there they were buried.
But some bankers still know about them. Unless they weren't filed, and that itself is a crime under the applicable law. (hat tip 9th Life)
==========================================
Hmmmmmmmm....that sounds like a job for The Donald....who knows every banker on earth.
The Kremlin is debating whether to release the 20,000 emails they have hacked off of Hillary Clinton’s server. According to a report from four days ago, beginning in 2011, the Russians began monitoring Romanian computer hacker Marcel Lazăr Lehel (aka Guccifer) after he attempted, unsuccessfully, to break into the computer system of the Russian funded RT television network.
After monitoring Guccifer, the Russians were reportedly able to record (both physically and electronically) his actions which allowed the Russian intelligence analysts, in 2013, to not only detect his breaking into the private computer of Secretary Clinton, but also break in and copy all of its contents as well.
The report notes that shortly after Russia obtained Clinton’s emails, they released a limited amount to RT TV which were published in an article in March 2013, titled Hillary Clinton’s ‘hacked’ Benghazi emails: FULL RELEASE.
Apparently no Western journalists promoted this story in 2013. (Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Oh I’ve investigated cotprruption and financial fraud for years. If the transactions were in the actual names of the politicians involved it would be so easy but they never are. Being lawyers they know to set up shell companies, trusts and use proxies to handle their transaction to bypass scrutiny. Offshore accounts amd online banking make it even more difficult to investigate. Many of the cases are opened when someone involved in the process gets mistreated by the politician and they come forward.
Now would be a good time while Lynch and Obonzo are preoccupied with toilets.
The story I read on this earlier today was saying that they can’t find his PST file. That just screams of a major LIE to me - individuals use PST files for their private email accounts. This guy supposedly had an official account that almost certainly would have been maintained on the Exchange Server, so it’s highly unlikely that all of his emails would have been stored in a PST file.
If you examine just about all the scandals involving the Clinton's you'll notice how many of the witnesses to their crimes were jailed or "pardoned" for agreeing not to testify. Immunity probably granted for the same reason. Who else here would get that deal under the same circumstances? None would.
When he went to jail, investigators found Madoff had stashed billions offshore---into a labyrinth of financial entities.
COLLUSION AND CONSPIRACIES GALORE Some $8.9 billion was funneled to Madoff through a dozen so-called feeder funds based in Europe, the Caribbean and Central America......a labyrinth of hedge funds, management companies and service providers that, to unsuspecting outsiders, seemed to compose a formidable system of checks and balances.
But the purpose of this complex architecture was just the opposite: the feeder funds provided different modes for directing money to Madoff in order to avoid scrutiny and to generate more fees for his bogus investment scheme.
The platform from which she deleted them would have to be completely and absolutely not connected to any other State Dept. infrastructure or any other simple network where backups were done. Otherwise, there are backups somewhere.
Which I suspect the lyin' king has done also. Someone knows. Hopefully they will come forward before they are murdered.
The State Dept needs to get pre-teens in there. The tech-savvy kids will find them in a nanosecond, no matter where they are.
Just turn him loose of the DoS files.
Hillary’s Emails Hacked by Russia – Kremlin Deciding Whether to Release 20,000 Stolen Emails The Gateway Pundit ^ | May 10, 2016 | Jim Hoft Posted on 5/10/2016, 6:38:13 AM by maggief
The Kremlin is debating whether to release the 20,000 emails they have hacked off of Hillary Clinton’s server.
According to a report from four days ago, beginning in 2011, the Russians began monitoring Romanian computer hacker Marcel Lazăr Lehel (aka Guccifer) after he attempted, unsuccessfully, to break into the computer system of the Russian funded RT television network.
After monitoring Guccifer, the Russians were reportedly able to record (both physically and electronically) his actions which allowed the Russian intelligence analysts, in 2013, to not only detect his breaking into the private computer of Secretary Clinton, but also break in and copy all of its contents as well.
The report notes that shortly after Russia obtained Clinton’s emails, they released a limited amount to RT TV which were published in an article in March 2013, titled Hillary Clinton’s ‘hacked’ Benghazi emails: FULL RELEASE.
Apparently no Western journalists promoted this story in 2013.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com .
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3429226/posts
Well, maybe a little older, but a substantial monetary reward would probably true them up.
I wonder what a secret sex tape of Hillary and Huma would be worth?
Amazing...we get our news from UK newspapers and our own Supermarket Tabloids
...and now all the State Department secrets from Russia.
...The most transparent administration evar.
need a Leavenworth in every state to accommodate the felons.
Who knows what the FBI asked Pagliano maybe “how about those Capitols”? But he was given immunity to answer honestly and provide documents. If he can’t produce documents the FBI asks for then he loses his immunity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.