Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76
We had a crazy case here in Upstate. There was a large stock pond on the property. It had been there for years. DEC said it was a wetland...Insanity ensued. The property owner won in the end.

Another case...DEC said it was a wetland. I listened to the threast as I sat at the table. The owner showed them 100 year old pictures of the property with buildings and a peach orchard. The owner won.

28 posted on 05/27/2021 12:05:26 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau

Chantell and Michael Sackett received a local permit to build a modest three-bedroom home on a half-acre lot in an existing, partially built-out residential subdivision in Priest Lake, Idaho.

The home poses no threat to water quality but federal EPA regulators nonetheless declared their property to contain a wetland and demanded they stop all work and restore the lot to its natural condition or pay fines of up to $75,000 per day. When they sued to challenge this order, EPA asserted they had no right to judicial review. The district court and Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, and tossed their lawsuit out of court. The United States Supreme Court unanimously reversed, ruling that failure to allow the lawsuit violated the Sacketts’ constitutional due process rights.

https://pacificlegal.org/case/sackett-v-environmental-protection-agency/


29 posted on 05/27/2021 12:32:46 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson