Posted on 05/09/2016 9:18:52 AM PDT by rktman
Actress Julianne Moore attended a march for gun control on Saturday, telling attendees that gun control “is not a Second Amendment issue.”
The march was organized by Michael Bloomberg-funded Moms Demand Action.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
“The stupid is strong with this one.”
She could have a point. Small arms could be banned
constitutionally but at great expense to the left.
“Actress Julianne Moore attended a march for gun control on Saturday, telling attendees that gun control “is not a Second Amendment issue.””
Actually, she is right. Gun control is not a second amendment issue. I defy any of you to show me where it is. I looked. I looked to see if it was better to control my gun with a one handed or two handed grip? Couldn’t find it anywhere in the constitution.
Personally, I prefer controlling my gun like a gangsta, tilting it to its side and closing my right eye.
She is a LIAR, and bound for the lake of fire as it stands right now.
I’ve always been greatly annoyed by her ‘squint and whisper’ routine that’s supposed to convey emotion, intensity, etc.
She’s well over the hill but still regularly puts those blotchy plucked-chicken legs on display in photographs.
I once searched and WHOIS-ed all the Bloomberg-originated ‘grassroots’ anti-gun groups and domains.
As you might expect, they all have telltale simplistic names and a prepositional phrase: Moms Demand Action, Pastors For Safe Streets, Iowa Mothers For Gun Safety, etc. etc.
It is the worst form of AstroTurf. Reporters are paid to do what I did in under 10 minutes. They refuse to do so. Why?
Good point.
One hand or two?
5.56mm
I have no clue who Julianne Moore is, other than an imbecile.
One. With two I would look pretty stupid.
More proof that the ability to remember a few lines for a moment or two in front of a camera is not a sign of intelligence.
In a way she is right though, real gun control is more of an eye-hand coordination thing.
More proof that any fool can win an Oscar.
Liberal actors seem to have no connection to reality. I guess that is why they can (sometimes) act so convincingly - they immerse themselves in fantasy and can’t tell the difference from reality.
I suppose we’d fight in the streets for Julianne’s right to express her opinion, but would anybody give two cents for it?
It’s like saying a $10,000 poll tax on blacks is not about voting rights.
Julianne Moore needs to be Schlonged by Dirk Diggler.
Uh huh ... it is interference with that “shall not be infringed” part...
Just a suggestion Julianne, perhaps you should actually read the Second Amendment before you go out and make astoundingly ignorant comments.
Does she resemble Caitlyn Jenner?
On the same FR page, this headline appears: “Felon with gun killed by man with concealed carry permit.”
Be advised that this is exactly the kind of outcome that Julianne Moore and those of her vapid ilk do not want to see. She is for armed felons prevailing over their unarmed innocent prey.
Julianne should go abort herself.
That’s ridiculous in two instances:
1: We all know felons CAN’T have guns.
2. There are NEVER any self defense uses of firearms. EVER!
At least that’s what “they” tell us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.