Skip to comments.
Clinton: ‘I Always Take Classified Material Seriously. There’s No Argument About That’
cnsnews.com ^
| 5/9/2016
| unknown
Posted on 05/09/2016 8:32:41 AM PDT by rktman
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on CBS’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday that she always takes “classified material seriously” and that she was not aware of any argument about that.
“I always took classified material seriously,” Clinton said, responding to a question from host John Dickerson about the controversy over her using a private email server for official business when she was secretary of state. “There was never any material marked classified that was sent or received by me. And I look forward to this being wrapped up.”
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintongate; lyineyes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 last
To: SERKIT
81
posted on
05/09/2016 2:18:16 PM PDT
by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
To: Alas Babylon!
If you take an appropriately marked classified document and simply type the contents into say, and email or attached document to send out on a non-secure system without including the original classification markers, you have committed a crime. US Code 10: 10 years jail; $10,000 fine Succinctly stated, my FRiend, and 100 % Correct.
Nobody, including alleged SOS, is above this law.
.
82
posted on
05/09/2016 3:11:31 PM PDT
by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except for convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: rktman
and then she “snap” “snap’ “Huma! Get me some more gum!”
To: rktman
The Clintons are masters of the direct lie. Look in the camera and bite our lip and say, I didn’t not have sex with......... Or i always protect classified communications..........
To: rlmorel
Yes, I read that fine book and also Hell to Pay by the late Barbara Olson. Both required reading, or should be.
And, if I correctly recall, Dereliction of Duty by Patterson (mainly about bubba) had some important observations about Hillary as well.
.
85
posted on
05/09/2016 3:28:46 PM PDT
by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except for convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: morphing libertarian
The Clintons are masters of the direct lie. Look in the camera and bite our lip and say, I didn’t not have sex with......... Or i always protect classified communications.......... True, that.
I might add that while Bill is an accomplished, non-stop liar, Hillary is a just plain awful, non-stop liar.
(Neither is bothered even a teensy bit by that conscience thingy.)
.
86
posted on
05/09/2016 3:31:56 PM PDT
by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except for convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: Seaplaner
LOL, If one can be judged by the company one keeps, it is probably also true for the literary company one keeps...
I have all of those...
87
posted on
05/09/2016 3:38:25 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
("Irrational violence against muslims" is a myth, but "Irrational violence against non-muslims" isn't)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
