Excellent on the part of SAS. But here's the joyous part: "The captives are then handed to either Kurdish or Iraqi security officials for interrogation."
If there is justice in the world, film and audio of them being "questioned" by Kurdish fighting females will be posted on the internet.
Oh my, that sounds a helluva lot worse than waterboarding...what are the liberal squishes going to do now?
Job well done, members of Britain’s SAS!
“Kidnapped?”
I must get back to school. I thought you captured enemies.
They mean "Apprehended", or better "Seized", not kidnapped. Are these ISIS chiefs regarded as innocent children being held for ransom?
Kidnapped, yet. Good grief.
I am sure the Kurds or Iraqis politely ask the captives if there is any information they would like to contribute.
In and before WWII, if you know where these people are, you just bomb a 50 square mile area around them into rubble, or burn it down like Dresden. No risk of American military casualties. The three are taken out. (And where there are three there are probably another 500.) It’s a win-win.
I thought after 'Nam it wouldn't happen again, but it became worse than ever as the 60s radicals like the Clintons took power. To them, if the choice is risking one enemy civilian life, they're willing to lose thousands of our soldiers to keep one collateral damage casualty from occurring.
I bet that on Trump’s inauguration day, hanging within 20 miles of an ISIS chief will be avoided like the plague. Trump “lightning strikes” won’t care if you’re a “chief” or an “indian”.
Next months headline: Three ISIS chiefs released to their home countries
Feed it pork.
Good to hear.