Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Trump is right that we'd have trouble servicing the debt if interest rates spiked. That is why he needs to present a serious plan on entitlements. Talking about repudiating the national debt is a bad idea, since it increases federal borrowing costs. Actually doing it would cause a financial crash worse than 2008.
1 posted on 05/06/2016 5:38:20 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: reaganaut1

The damned NYT had no problem with Obama riunning up the National Debt to the tune of $20 Trillion and not a word from the whores at the NYT about that.


60 posted on 05/06/2016 6:48:12 AM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

The Federal Reserve is NOT a voluntary contract.

The people are not obligated to pay. It is not like a car payment.
No nation’s people are required to pay their central bank.
Zip. Zilch. Nada.
Central banks are a fool’s scam.
Govt is the Big Lie.

Go Trump Go!


64 posted on 05/06/2016 6:52:23 AM PDT by TheNext
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

In other words he wants to do the Greek strategy. Tell them you’ll default unless that agree to take less than they are owed. But I have to say I think that is actually inevitable irrespective of what Trump says. He’s doing us a favor by saying it now rather than pretending the problem doesnt exist.


66 posted on 05/06/2016 6:53:45 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

If I were one of those creditors, and was offered the choice of ten cents on the dollar now, or certain collapse in the future, I know what I’d do.


70 posted on 05/06/2016 7:00:07 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
One of the many alternatives used in the REAL business world.

Unfortunately, in the past, the Government uses only "bailouts" at the expense of the taxpayers to solve thier problems.

My point: THEY do NOT lose... the taxpayers DO.

87 posted on 05/06/2016 7:39:04 AM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

We have 94 million people out of work.

The tax revenues from them being employed would be $2 trillion per year into the government coffers.

That would reduce the debt rather decently.


88 posted on 05/06/2016 7:41:14 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (He wins & we do, our nation does, the world does. It's morning in America again. You are living it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
We've managed to run our national credit card up to $20 Trillion which is more than everybody makes (our GDP) in an entire year - and we expect there are zero consequences for our complete irresponsibility as a nation?

Imagine if you made $50,000 a year, continued to spend $70,000 a year (putting the balance on your credit cards) and today had a credit card debt of $450,000. Where do you think that would lead - especially if your credit interest rate was 1% but was soon going up?

Let's face it. We've been totally screwed by our politicians. They have been spending our money and going into huge debt to get themselves re-elected. Both Parties have been playing the game and kicking the inevitable calamity down the road.

The complete economic crash will be coming soon. Trump is sending up the WARNING flags now. He sees it and so do most of us who are paying attention. The coming economic reckoning is a disaster and it can't be stopped without radical and massive surgery soon. It can only be mitigated if we miraculously get a booming economy (more revenue), massively cut our expenses (hugely doubtful), and start paying off our principle. And then we might have a chance if the interest rates stay historically low - and it will still take many years to do it.

It's bleak out there, folks, and Trump is only pointing it out. The Washington politicians sure won't.

93 posted on 05/06/2016 7:44:58 AM PDT by Gritty (Assent to obvious lies is co-operating with evil. A society of liars is easy to control.-T.Dalrymple)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

From my end Trump can have quite a bit of slack to pursue strategies or head games with our creditors/competitors. I certainly don’t want him to curtail his options to those that comfort the weakest links.


104 posted on 05/06/2016 8:26:56 AM PDT by BiggerTigger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Issuing bonds when rates are low, and buying the same bonds back and retiring them when rates rise (and bonds sell at a discount) is standard practice for corporations.

However, it does not necessarily work with the government, because the government does not usually have excess cash around to purchase and retired debt. It could work for a government who was operating at a surplus.

The only way the government could do this would be to issue new debt, but the new debt would be priced exactly the same as the purchased debt, because of the fact the two bonds would be considered exactly the same risk.

In finance, there is a term called the “risk-free interest rate”. It is generally approximated by government bonds issued by large stable economies.


150 posted on 05/09/2016 12:22:47 PM PDT by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson