Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz Cult Exposed – “Religion” of 7 Mountain Strategy A Cult Of Heidi’s NWO
Rick Wells.US ^ | 4-2-2016 | Rick Wells

Posted on 05/03/2016 12:17:05 PM PDT by sevinufnine

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-228 next last
To: Jim 0216

This new doctrine is sterile, murderous, and doomed.

It is the old blab it and grab it prayer superstition, attached to worldly power and wealth.

You are offered the full armor of God, and crawl around in the mud for rubber filing stamps and handcuffs.


201 posted on 05/03/2016 7:08:49 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (That giant flushing sound is the New Whirled Order, going down the tubes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

Let me know when you’re able to put together a rational and coherent argument. Your confusion is apparent when you actually think I’m talking about “Dominionism.”

The founding of America memorialized by the carved monuments and buildings that fill Washington D.C. and “let your light shine before men that they may see your good works and glorify your Father which is in Heaven” is no new doctrine, but yours is. Your isolationist doctrine is why the godless control our institutions and why there is such a strong “anti-establishment” movement going on right now. It is your isolationism that is “sterile, murderous, and doomed.”


202 posted on 05/03/2016 7:28:28 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

Let me know when you are willing to hold a position.

The discussion is about Dominionism, or any analogous position.

My ‘isolationist doctrine’ is identical to Geo. Washington’s, and I will hold in the face of any globalist scheme.


203 posted on 05/03/2016 8:19:50 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (That giant flushing sound is the New Whirled Order, going down the tubes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

This discussion has nothing to do with Dominionism and your thinking so evidences your confusion.

Again, confusing
1) freedom of religious exercise in government and elsewhere with
2) promoting a state-run church,
is exactly the kind of confusion the Left wants you to have to keep you under their tyranny.

George Washington and our Founders had no such confusion.


204 posted on 05/03/2016 8:45:43 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

I agree with you. I was involved with Loren Cunningham’s YWAM in the 90’s and there was good and bad as it was an umbrella parachurch organization. I rally like Francis Shaeffer and I hardly think Shaeffer would have endorsed modern Christian dominionism. Totally fine to seek to be salt and light in every area that a person interacts in in the world.

This stuff is elated to Rousas John Rushdoony who founded the Christian reconstruction movement in the 1970’s which wishes to assert of theonomic form of government where only Christian’s in good standing are given full rights and Old Covenant laws are put in place. A New Covenant Halacha enforced at the point of a gun. Absolute tyranny and heterodox.

There is some of this stuff in the Messianic Jewish movement in which I have been a part of off and on over the years. Lots of good and ding dong bad which leads to heresy and unbelief. I just mention this because Cruz’s father’s church/assembly has been linked to and spoken of as a Hebrew roots/Messianic congregation. Obviously these small independent congregations can run the gamut as far as orthodox belief from cult to all points in between kinda thing.

I do think that many of the political Christian organizations in Washington and elsewhere that overtly exist to influence government have been infected with a strange dominionist theology that is a deception. The deception is that it allows compromise so that Christian’s will embrace a false substitute kingdom that is in essence the antithesis of God’s kingdom. People will embrace the Anti-Christian NWO prophesied in God’s word for a seat at the table thinking they are doing God’s will when it is everything but. It is very dangerous, subtle and appealing, especially for Christians who deny the permanency of the Abrahamic covenant or promises and thus reject God’s unfolding plans and dealings with Israel and the Church. In Dominionism people will find themselves fighting against God’s endtime plans just as the Jewish Temple authorities said acknowledged to let the followers of Yeshua/Jesus and the apostles be because they might be fighting against God.

Very much like post-millenialism which was popular in the 19th century which sought to set up a perfect Christian kingdom in all spheres of life which would then signal or usher in the second coming of Jesus and the thousand year reign. Pretty much went by the weigh side with WWI and the dissolution of modernity and 20th Century. This was a healthy thing because the false positive viewpoint is not in the Bible and just wishful thinking and manipulation.


205 posted on 05/03/2016 11:14:08 PM PDT by Sheapdog (Chew the meat, spit out the bones - FUBO - Come and get me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: norton

I’m talking about statements that have come straight out of the mouths of the people I mentioned, and it is on video. I’m not talking about rumors and hearsay.


206 posted on 05/04/2016 2:23:47 AM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: sevinufnine
Sorry, but I don’t want someone like that trying to tell me how to live when they apply NOTHING to their own lives.

Dang!!

She could be first female pope!!



 


Pope Stephen VI (896–897), who had his predecessor Pope Formosus exhumed, tried, de-fingered, briefly reburied, and thrown in the Tiber.[1]

Pope John XII (955–964), who gave land to a mistress, murdered several people, and was killed by a man who caught him in bed with his wife.

Pope Benedict IX (1032–1044, 1045, 1047–1048), who "sold" the Papacy

Pope Boniface VIII (1294–1303), who is lampooned in Dante's Divine Comedy

Pope Urban VI (1378–1389), who complained that he did not hear enough screaming when Cardinals who had conspired against him were tortured.[2]

Pope Alexander VI (1492–1503), a Borgia, who was guilty of nepotism and whose unattended corpse swelled until it could barely fit in a coffin.[3]

Pope Leo X (1513–1521), a spendthrift member of the Medici family who once spent 1/7 of his predecessors' reserves on a single ceremony[4]

Pope Clement VII (1523–1534), also a Medici, whose power-politicking with France, Spain, and Germany got Rome sacked.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bad_Popes
 
 
 
 

207 posted on 05/04/2016 4:43:52 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: azcap
I really don’t get the Freeper hostility to this idea of Christians trying to make an impact in their world.

Easy!


1. They are not Christian.
2. They've been hurt by a 'christian'.
3. They are Christians who confuse Meekness with Weakness.

208 posted on 05/04/2016 4:46:33 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: azcap
Way PAST time for them to do so.

Be Silent no longer; Majority!!!


209 posted on 05/04/2016 4:47:34 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco; goat granny

...and GOATS!


210 posted on 05/04/2016 4:48:21 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Mr. M.J.B.

Cult | Definition of Cult by Merriam-Webster

www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cult

Video embedded · Origin of cult. French & Latin; French culte, from Latin cultus care, adoration, from colere to cultivate — more at wheel. First Known Use: 1617. Related to cult.


211 posted on 05/04/2016 4:50:00 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: bushwon
For example, I heard today that Beck was on suicide watch...did not believe there was any such truth...turned out he has threatened Indiana voters he might if they don’t do right thing...

OOOoooh!




          ELSIE;
 
    I'm comin' to GETCHA!!

212 posted on 05/04/2016 4:53:34 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: richardtavor
It is not contingent upon which Church or denomination one belongs to.

Along with kitty; you make our FR Catholics cry.



213 posted on 05/04/2016 4:57:35 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144
We ARE called upon to be salt and light in a SPIRITUAL war.

While wearing...

... the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you will be able to stand your ground, and having done everything, to stand.

Stand firm then,
with the belt of truth fastened around your waist,
with the breastplate of righteousness arrayed,
and with your feet fitted with the readiness of the gospel of peace.

Ephesians 6:13-15

214 posted on 05/04/2016 5:01:08 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Nifster
I do not think a follower of the Nazarene is the criteria to define good men of faith. I have many a Jew who fits that definition but not yours.

Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

John 14:6 New International Version



Be careful just where you place your 'faith'.

215 posted on 05/04/2016 5:03:28 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

“This discussion has nothing to do with Dominionism and your thinking so evidences your confusion.”

Of course not. It is merely the entire thread topic.


216 posted on 05/04/2016 6:05:20 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (That giant flushing sound is the New Whirled Order, going down the tubes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Sheapdog

You are clearly more knowledgeable about the phenomenon than I am, but you outline exactly what I find the most disturbing about it, as a false doctrine which lends itself to globalism and globalists. The slipperiness of it is in that is starts with a truth, that we are called to extend Christian influence where we are. Then there is the leap to “commandeering” all aspects of life as one proponent here states it.


217 posted on 05/04/2016 6:10:16 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (That giant flushing sound is the New Whirled Order, going down the tubes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

That’s fine for one’s personal walk and belief. We were talking about good men of faith being in GOVERNMENT.

We do not live in a country where there is a religious test to be part of the government. And frankly I never want to live in a country like that


218 posted on 05/04/2016 7:07:28 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

Well, you seem to fail to understand or acknowledge the critical distinction here - the difference between the need for Christians to rise to the top of American professions and institutions versus some loony state-run Church concept and for people to not confuse the two which the Leftist-driven unconstitutional phrase “separation of church and state” has generated.

Again, faith-filled Christian withdrawal form leadership in our societal institutions which created a vacuum in which the godless readily and happily filled is what has got us into the mess.


219 posted on 05/04/2016 9:09:07 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

Not responsive to the topic. Your comments are non sequiturs to the discussion of Dominionist deviance.

We’re done.


220 posted on 05/04/2016 9:11:09 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (That giant flushing sound is the New Whirled Order, going down the tubes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-228 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson