Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

9,000 Photos from 1800’s British Mandate of Palestine – with no trace of Muslims or mosques
Pamela Geller ^ | 5/1/16 | Pamela Geller

Posted on 05/01/2016 8:31:23 PM PDT by Nachum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: BenLurkin
Al aqsa is NOT the Dome of the Rock. It is a completely separate structure, not far from the Dome.

ML/NJ

41 posted on 05/02/2016 5:46:53 AM PDT by ml/nj (av)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

great post.. thanks SJ


42 posted on 05/02/2016 5:55:10 AM PDT by DollyCali
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

I noted that when I read what Twain wrote in “Innocents Abroad.” (It’s a free ebook that you can find online.)

The way he described it in the late 1860s was that the Middle East then was a poor, neglected province of the Ottoman Empire.


43 posted on 05/02/2016 6:12:19 AM PDT by JeffChrz (2016--time for the rest of the country to stop being stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JeffChrz
I have a 1911 Baedeker handbook, The Mediterranean (translation of the 1909 German edition)), which includes information on Jerusalem and other places in the Holy Land that a traveler might want to visit.

For Jerusalem it says that the population is estimated at about 70,000, of which 45,000 are Jews, 15,000 Christians (nearly half Syrians of the Greek Orthodox faith), and about 10,000 Moslems.

For Bethlehem it says the population is about 11,000, almost all Christians.

For Er-Ramleh, it has the population "exceeding 7,000, including 2500 Christians." It says the mosque in that town was built in 1318 in a style resembling the Romanesque transition buildings of the Crusaders.

There was a separate volume, Palestine and Syria, which I don't have, which would have given fuller information.

44 posted on 05/02/2016 7:48:26 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

And of course the Ottoman Empire was MUSLIM, although I understand fairly tolerant to minorities such as Christians and Jews by the 1800s (although historically they liked to kidnap boys from Christian areas and turn them into janissaries—the Sultan’s personal soldiers).


45 posted on 05/02/2016 1:22:28 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Remember also that Lebanon, although Arabic, was heavily Christian (mostly Catholic). Most left, starting in the early 1900s.


46 posted on 05/02/2016 1:24:58 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Thanks Nachum.

47 posted on 05/02/2016 2:46:14 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; decimon; 1010RD; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; ...

48 posted on 05/02/2016 2:48:30 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

There was no “British mandate of Palestine” in the 1800s. Palestine was a province of Turkey in the 1800s. It did not become a British Mandate until after World War I.


49 posted on 05/02/2016 2:58:56 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

British mandate in Palestine in the 1800’s???


50 posted on 05/02/2016 4:21:45 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Yes, of course you are correct, Al Aqsa is a separate structure. But, if you look closely at the French photographer’s work, the building he has recorded is the Dome of the Rock. In the B&W photos, it looks different, because it does not have the characteristic copper/gold top.

It would appear that both Al Aksa and the Dome are mosques. What would they be, if not mosques?

Like you, indeed I noticed the weeds growing on the pavement. It evidently was not trodden by heaps of people at that time.


51 posted on 05/02/2016 4:47:13 PM PDT by BlackVeil ('The past is never dead. It's not even past.' William Faulkner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Prospero

Thank you for that link. The antique photos are wonderful.


52 posted on 05/02/2016 4:49:32 PM PDT by BlackVeil ('The past is never dead. It's not even past.' William Faulkner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
It would appear that both Al Aksa and the Dome are mosques. What would they be, if not mosques?

Wikipedia is your friend, sometimes.

Note that the Dome does not have an accompanying missile silo, traditional of all mosques I know of.

ML/NJ

53 posted on 05/02/2016 5:51:42 PM PDT by ml/nj (av)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

i was gonna post that quote from Twain if I could find it. g;ad you had it at hand.


54 posted on 05/02/2016 8:10:05 PM PDT by wildbill (If you check behind the shower curtain for a slasher, and find one.... what's your plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
Wiki is not always a good source. I find this claim - also written elsewhere on the internet - that the Dome of the Rock is not a mosque but a shrine. That is an odd claim. It is obviously a shrine - to that rock which is deemed sacred - but it has all the facilities of a mosque, and people pray there. It seems like saying that Notre-Dame cathedral is a shrine to the Virgin Mary - and therefore not a church.

In the past, it was always called a mosque. St John Philby, and all those types of Arabists, often called it the mosque of Omar.

People hostile to the presence of the Dome of the Rock often call for "that mosque" to be taken down. One doesn't hear any calls for the destruction of "that shrine".

We find, in Crossovers: Anti-Zionism and Anti-Semitism by Shlomo Sharan, Dāwid Bûqay: "Abd al-Malik ... in 691 he built the mosque called the Dome of the Rock" (p 143)

And it has been called a mosque for centuries:

There is an often quoted statement of Muslim historian al-Muqaddasi on the reason for the building of Dome of the Rock. ...

O my little son, thou has no understanding. Verily al-Walid was right, and he was prompted to a worthy work. For he beheld Syria to be a country that had long been occupied by the Christians, and he noted there are beautiful churches still belonging to them ... So he sought to build for the Muslims a mosque that should be unique and a wonder to the world.

55 posted on 05/02/2016 8:54:54 PM PDT by BlackVeil ('The past is never dead. It's not even past.' William Faulkner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Palestine was and IDEA .. NOT A COUNTRY. It was a place to dump undesirables .. and a place to hide the terrorists who would attack Israel.


56 posted on 05/02/2016 9:41:12 PM PDT by CyberAnt ("Peace Through Strength")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian; Tallguy

And you wonder why some of us aren’t part of the Geller fan club?.


57 posted on 05/03/2016 3:48:09 AM PDT by the scotsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
I find this claim - also written elsewhere on the internet - that the Dome of the Rock is not a mosque but a shrine.

I have a 1979 Encyclopedia Britannica on my shelf. I'll quote from their entry on the Dome of the Rock:

The Dome of the Rock was built between AD 685 and 691 by the caliph 'Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan, not aas a mosque for public worship but as a mashhad, a shrine for pilgrims.
ML/NJ
58 posted on 05/03/2016 5:17:48 AM PDT by ml/nj (av)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
to be current, we have Wikipedia...... The Dome of the Rock (Arabic: قبة الصخرة‎, translit.: Qubbat al-Sakhrah, Hebrew: כיפת הסלע‎, translit.: Kippat ha-Sela) is a shrine located on the Temple Mount in the Old City of Jerusalem. It was initially completed in 691 CE at the order of Umayyad Caliph Abd al-Malik during the Second Fitna. The Dome of the Rock is now one of the oldest works of Islamic architecture.[2] It has been called "Jerusalem's most recognizable landmark,"[3] and it is a UNESCO World Heritage Site, along with two nearby Temple Mount structures, the Western Wall, and the "Resurrection Rotunda" in the nearby Church of the Holy Sepulchre.[4] Its architecture and mosaics were patterned after nearby Byzantine churches and palaces.[5] The octagonal plan of the structure may also have been influenced by the Byzantine Church of the Seat of Mary (also known as Kathisma in Greek and al-Qadismu in Arabic) built between 451 and 458 on the road between Jerusalem and Bethlehem.[6] The site's significance stems in part from religious traditions regarding the rock, known as the Foundation Stone, at its heart, which bears great significance for Jews and Muslims. It is recognized by all three Abrahamic religions as the site of Abraham's sacrifice of Isaac.
59 posted on 05/03/2016 5:22:38 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: bert
to be current, we have Wikipedia..

I'm not sure what you mean by that remark. The 1979 EB is generally a much more accurate source for historical information than things written today, as it was published before Political Correctness and revisionist history set in. So for example it speaks of TWO cities holy to Islam, Mecca and Medina, not three as the revisionist Muslims and their Amen Corner pretend there to have been.

BTW, I would note that the Dome having been built for Pilgrims indicates that it wasn't built for the local population.

ML/NJ

60 posted on 05/03/2016 5:29:44 AM PDT by ml/nj (av)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson