I’ll leave that open to interpretation, but I believe it’s more likely inept civil management of a situation.
They don’t want to be seen as cracking heads, so they stand back and hope for the best.
None the less, that does put people at risk, and I believe that includes Trump.
The S. S. will only put up with so much though. These people try anything real against Trump, and they’ll be dead very quickly.
There are videos showing that they actually penetrated that building yesterday. Scary.
The S. S. will only put up with so much though......They will do exactly as told by the Democrat party. Trust me. If they don’t, AA is on the line and Jackson and Sharp will be called to account. But not for Taxes.
I know that it may be my testosterone talking, but if that were to happen to me, with my wife, they’d be dead very quickly.
Your interpretation is much more lenient than mine. I can understand the theory of crowd containment and not wanting to escalate the situation. However, these are vicious people, LEO is playing with fire, and they know it.
I don’t understand why the Hyatt would have been subject to allowing a riot on their property. Their number one responsibility is the safety and comfort of their guests. It would have been smart to have rejected trespassers. Hyatt could be held liable for injuries on their property. What about the other hotel guests? Why should they be subjected to personal risk? Why are they to be held hostage in the hotel, praying the lynch mob does not break through.
Instead of an effigy of Trump, what if they had torched the trees or the hotel? They looked liked the type of trash that wouldn’t hesitate to be flamers. The hotel had to padlock some of the supplemental entrances from the inside once the thugs broke down the barricades. How insane is that?
Anyone coincidently staying at the Hyatt and facing a mob on their property should have been demanding a free stay and police escort to one of their other properties. Riots at the Hyatt is bad for business and destroys their **** ratings.