Brown is much better on amnesty than many other alternatives.
Better than rubio and the others that have been floated.
He tries to appeal to white women voters whereas others might try to appear to push amnesty to hispanics.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/scott-brown-on-elizabeth-warrens-claim-she-kept-her-clothes-on-during-college-thank-god/2011/03/03/gIQATkHCQL_blog.html
Jim Webb. The old Jim Webb. “Born Fighting” Jim Webb.
Or Bernie.
Not Scott Brown. He’s got a little bit of the “ick” factor. He was too fast to compromise once he got to the US Senate. He lost the seat to Warren, who is in contention for VP.
Funny how the article is based on a question instead of a statement, and so many Trump haters decide to act as if it’s set in stone. Bunch of shark-jumping losers which is apropos for those who will follow Cruz into the ground.
Scott Walker was a squishy, weak campaigner, but looking at how he has handled the Maggots in Madison, I still think he would be a great choice. There is a fire in him.
Scot Brown makes no sense and he will not be Trumps VP.
That would be a big mistake. Scott Brown is not liked by the Tea Party voters and he’s not liked by the leftists, either. He’s a globalist all the way and showed disdain for American-Americans. Got along great with Ms. Lindsay and her boyfriend McStupid.