To: Hojczyk
He is forced to support his lazy son only because it was part of his divorce agreement.
2 posted on
04/27/2016 7:23:36 PM PDT by
Brooklyn Attitude
(It's the apocalypse, lets have some fun!)
To: Brooklyn Attitude
He is forced to support his lazy son only because it was part of his divorce agreement.
That's how I read it, too - otherwise, this would be slavery, pure and simple.
But divorce agreement or not, I have no idea how a 28 year old man could be comfortable taking money from his father.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson