And the fact if Cruz were elected President no matter how much he is against it, he would have nothing to do with it either as President!
I think you had better study up on your laws of logic.
Again, were talking about a presidential candidate taking two positions on an issue within a span of 12 hours in front of two different audiences. If you dont see the contradiction in that, youre looking for an excuse.
Of course he “expanded” his thoughts. He got slammed for his original thoughts.
I’m not a fan of Cruz either. That said, I’m confident that Cruz would have expressed his personal opinion on the matter and then immediately addressed the constitutionality of the NC law. He would not have had to expand on that part of his answer later after thinking about it some more. Constitutional matters are instinct to Cruz. That’s why he belongs on SCOTUS.