To: olezip
It matters not whether Cheri Jacobus is a "woman scorned" or the innocent victim of sexual advances by Donald Trump, it matters not whether she is a woman of no virtue or as saintly as mother Theresa, it matters whether or not Donald Trump lied about her maliciously to her damage.
I am assuming the court would find her to be a public person and therefore malice on Trump's part would be required to be proven.
5 posted on
04/19/2016 2:32:52 AM PDT by
nathanbedford
("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
To: nathanbedford
“When Ms. Jacobus criticized Mr. Trump on CNN in late January and early February, Mr. Trump branded her on Twitter as “a real dummy” who had “begged my people for a job.” Mr. Lewandowski described her in similar terms on television.”
Seems malicious to me.
10 posted on
04/19/2016 3:17:40 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: nathanbedford
Now the guy who runs around here proudly displaying a picture of Nathan Bedford Forrest is a legal scholar as well? Amazing how well rounded you are.
22 posted on
04/19/2016 4:16:03 AM PDT by
usafa92
(Trump 2016 - Destroying the GOPe while Making America Great Again)
To: nathanbedford
"I am assuming the court would find her to be a public person and therefore malice on Trump's part would be required to be proven."You may be right on that, but it's hard for me to see how Baby Donald's public Tweets were not malicious.
28 posted on
04/19/2016 5:24:23 AM PDT by
norwaypinesavage
(The Stone Age did not end because we ran out of stones)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson