The girl has 'issues'.
Posted on 04/17/2016 6:52:08 PM PDT by Hojczyk
Fields insisted that, contrary to claims by Trump and Aronberg’s office, she never touched the candidate, who moved his right arm away from her in order to retrieve a pen from his jacket pocket in order to sign autographs as he made his way out of the golf club ballroom.
She also pointed out that Aronberg’s office, far from conducting the thorough investigation that was promised, didn’t even interview the main witness to the grabbing incident, Washington Post reporter Ben Terris.
“I think the prosecutor’s decision…the way they handled this entire situation…was very unprofessional,” Fields said.
Fields insisted that, contrary to claims by Trump and Aronberg’s office, she never touched the candidate, who moved his right arm away from her in order to retrieve a pen from his jacket pocket in order to sign autographs as he made his way out of the golf club ballroom.
She also pointed out that Aronberg’s office, far from conducting the thorough investigation that was promised, didn’t even interview the main witness to the grabbing incident, Washington Post reporter Ben Terris.
“I think the prosecutor’s decision…the way they handled this entire situation…was very unprofessional,” Fields said.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...
by the way....... what ever happened to Fluk
The girl has 'issues'.
Very good point. Ben Terris is the REAL villain in all of this. AND he still has his cushy job at the Washington Post.
Watch for his byline in the future. No doubt he’ll get a Pulitzer Prize for investigating Republican “Corruption” some day...
BUMP! Zoom in. Zoom out. See them all.
She needs to boil two bunnies and call the shrink in the morning.
And that wasn't even part of the original conversation. If you follow the conversation between Fields and Terris, Terris didn't Identify Lewandowski as the culprit, or maybe I should say his response was ambiguous and could be interpreted that way, if one wanted to see it that way.
----------------------------------
Fields: “I can’t believe he just did that that was so hard. Was that Corey?"
Terris: “Yeah, like, what threat were you?"
---------------------------------------------
Terris is asking a question, not answering Fields question as to who it was. Notice that Fields has the same kind of "yeah man... like blah blah blah response to Terris later in the conversation.
------------------------------------
Terris: “And he probably knows you, right?"
Fields: “Yeah, I don’t understand. That looks horrible. You’re going after a Breitbart reporter, the people who are nicest to you?"
-------------------------------------
His "yeah" response was indicative of acknowledging what Fields was saying. Fields tried to use that as confirmation that it was Lewandowski, because she didn't know who even pulled her away from Trump.
"Yeah" is a habit people have when speaking to give them time to organize their thoughts. Both Terris and Fields seems to use that quite a bit.
FOR EXAMPLE:
I say, "I just saw God. Did you ?
Your response, "Yeah, like that would be impossible dude."
Does that mean you AGREE because you said YEAH ?
I've seen the pictures and there were several "men with close cropped hair and suits" around Trump who reached out to move her, and more than once.
Source for Terris/Fields conversation: Exclusive: Transcript of female Breitbart reporter allegedly being roughed up by Trump campaign manager
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.