Well of course. It is the fact that they have lazy and incompetent idiots sitting on the bench that makes it so.
They are "procedure bound". They don't do their homework. Their methodology of "precedent" is horribly flawed. They listen only to forked tongued credentialed fools that are regarded as the "in" crowd in their larger "legal workers" social group, and they are as rational as a dart board.
This is why their is a virtually continuous stream of crap emanating from the various judiciary around the country. They couldn't hack Science and Engineering, which takes REAL intelligence, so they went into the quasi-logical sophistry that we call "law."
The Courts get to resolve ALL “cases and controversies” arising under the Constitution.
They get to decide which direction the guns are pointed. They don't "resolve" anything, at least in the manner of providing a well thought out, well reasoned solution to a problem.
If you don’t like it, move somewhere else.
Or we could just keep mocking and undermining their incompetent authority at every opportunity until we can get to a point where the public is ready to decorate lampposts with them.
That might actually solve some problems.
You said: “Their deliberations have no merit. Neither do their conclusions. They have power, but they do not have the correct answers.”