Revealed! Feds' demands to manipulate global-warming data

wnd.com ^ | 4/17/2016 | unknown

[rktman]

It’s something climate skeptics have long suspected: Government involvement in science has skewed data to reflect the government’s agenda.

“Many have suspected that U.S. political intervention in climate science has corrupted the outcome,” notes Ron Arnold in an essay posted on CFact.org. “The new emergence of an old 1995 document from the U.S. State Department to the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change confirms those suspicions, or at least gives the allegation credence enough to ask questions.”

Though a FOIA request for the 1995 document came up empty (“No such correspondence in our files”), the pdf is available online. The 30-page document, entitled “U.S. Government Specific Comments on the Draft IPCC WG I Summary for Policymakers,” gives detailed instructions on “how to change the IPCC’s science document and the summary for policymakers.”

“The document itself consists of a three-page cover letter to Sir John Houghton, head of IPCC Working Group I (Science), from Day Mount, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Acting, Environment and Development, United States Department of State, along with the thirty-page instruction set with line-by-line ‘suggestions,’ written by scientist Robert Watson and others,” writes Arnold.

[rktman]

Documents from way back in the last century like 1995. Probably not relevant any more because we all know the ipcc and the un have all corrected any past mistakes and now only tell the truth. Right? And DENIERS(flat earthers to some folks) are the bad guys?

[Wolfie]

This makes what, a half-dozen or so such revelations? Doesn’t seem to make much difference. The financial sector wants a new play toy, namely a mandatory Carbon Credit market, and they will get it one way or another.

[Don Corleone]

It has been an ill conceived and ill concealed POWER move from the very start.

[Rufii]

I visited the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo. last fall. The Center, which is maintained by the National Science Foundation includes a museum. However, many of the displays there were devoted to global warming propaganda, including the discredited Hockey Stick graph.

[SandRat]

Like we haven't suspected that from the very beginning.

[Trumpet 1]

Yeah, NCAR is a Communist propaganda tool. And Boulder is a leftist enclave. There are some nice looking instruments on display at NCAR. The way it works with socials governments, you have to repeat the lies in order to get the money.

[Lazamataz]

We have lost the right to criticize the former Soviet Union about ANYTHING any more.

[FlingWingFlyer]

The biggest hoax and scam ever pulled on a people by its so called “government”. It’s time to shut down the District of Corruption. For America’s sake.