Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VitacoreVision
Maybe I'm missing something here ...

If a U.S. court of law determines that Saudi Arabia had any involvement in 9/11 and awards monetary damages to any Americans in the process, doesn't this mean George W. Bush and a bunch of people from his administration ... along with most members of Congress at the time ... along with all of the same people in the Clinton and first Bush administrations ... should be on trial for war crimes?

Wouldn't a court decision like this be a formal admission that the U.S. was on the wrong side all the way back in 1990?

19 posted on 04/16/2016 5:49:01 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Sometimes I feel like I've been tied to the whipping post.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

George W. Bush had access to know Saudi Arabia’s involvement in 9/11, but did and said nothing about it.

Why?


25 posted on 04/16/2016 5:56:06 AM PDT by VitacoreVision
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child
"Wouldn't a court decision like this be a formal admission that the U.S. was on the wrong side all the way back in 1990?"

I am not a truther, but I doubt Congress would pass legislation allowing disclosure simply because of the implications that our government and elected officials have not been true defenders of America.

33 posted on 04/16/2016 6:10:29 AM PDT by buckalfa (I am feeling much better now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson